2019
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2019.1583270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of work–life balance and autonomy in the relationship between commuting, employee commitment and well-being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, under conditions of high objective virtuality, team managers should consider promoting interdependence with benefits. This means that giving team members work scheduling autonomy is relevant, especially for work-life balance (e.g., Emre & De Spiegeleare, 2019), but that feeling close to team members is enhanced when individuals keep or develop interdependencies among them that foster interaction. Depending on the type of job at hand, this can be done by promoting specific types of interdependence (i.e., reciprocal, sequential, or pooled interdependence, Saavedra et al, 1993), and coordination strategies that align with those.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, under conditions of high objective virtuality, team managers should consider promoting interdependence with benefits. This means that giving team members work scheduling autonomy is relevant, especially for work-life balance (e.g., Emre & De Spiegeleare, 2019), but that feeling close to team members is enhanced when individuals keep or develop interdependencies among them that foster interaction. Depending on the type of job at hand, this can be done by promoting specific types of interdependence (i.e., reciprocal, sequential, or pooled interdependence, Saavedra et al, 1993), and coordination strategies that align with those.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various research studies have discussed the effect of organisational, individual, external, and demographic factors on work -life balance (Abendroth & Dulk, 2011;Poulose & Sudarsan, 2017). According to scholarly literature, the largest positive effect on WLB is produced by such factors as supervisor assistance in reducing stress at work (Bell et al, 2012;Humayon et al, 2018), transformational leadership (Munir et al 2012), a healthy work environment (Nordenmark et al, 2012), flexible work practices, and the ability to control work place and time (Hayman, 2010;Emre & Spiegeleare, 2019), partner support (Abendroth & Dulk, 2011), and individual efforts to balance out well-being (Zheng et al, 2016).…”
Section: Work-life Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, research has also tended to show that employee's perception of work interference in their personal life, hereafter referred to as work-life imbalance, tended to be negatively related to organizational commitment, particularly to AC (Emre & De Spiegeleare, 2019;Fontinha, Easton, & Van Laar, 2019;Geraldes, Madeira, Carvalho, & Chambel, 2019). Despite a lack of research evidence related to how these results may translate to occupational commitment, the occupation, particularly in high level positions, differs from the organisation in not being bounded by work hours or attendance but being part of one's identity.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Commitment Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%