2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of working memory updating, inhibition, fluid intelligence, and reading comprehension in explaining differences between consistent and inconsistent arithmetic word-problem-solving performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater the number of nonconsistencies contained in the problem statement, the greater the number of interpretation errors that can lead to an incorrect arithmetic formalization and, therefore, errors in calculation during the resolution phase. The results of our study are similar to those found in other studies on consistent and inconsistent AWPs [34,44,45,75,88,89]. Inconsistent problems require a greater number of sentence readings and, therefore, greater dedication in terms of time and resources to be able to integrate the propositions relating the elements of the text, and to inhibit the initial representational models that arise from a superficial reading of the statements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater the number of nonconsistencies contained in the problem statement, the greater the number of interpretation errors that can lead to an incorrect arithmetic formalization and, therefore, errors in calculation during the resolution phase. The results of our study are similar to those found in other studies on consistent and inconsistent AWPs [34,44,45,75,88,89]. Inconsistent problems require a greater number of sentence readings and, therefore, greater dedication in terms of time and resources to be able to integrate the propositions relating the elements of the text, and to inhibit the initial representational models that arise from a superficial reading of the statements.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Given the type of response recorded by the participants, it is not possible to determine which of the two factors, inhibition or updating, contributed more to the performance produced. However, recent studies would point to a greater effect of updating as a main cause of poor performance for solving these problems [89].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence supporting a relationship between executive functions and fluid intelligence [ 54 ]. A study conducted by Passolunghi et al [ 55 ] with 182 fourth graders reported that the ability to solve inconsistent arithmetic word problems depended on the executive functions of WM, updating, and inhibition; this ability is not limited to solving arithmetic problems but also encompasses solving other problems, including verbal ones, that require fluid intelligence. WM and fluid intelligence differences may have a significant impact on reading comprehension even when accounting for children’s prior experience [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bull et al 2008, see Frisovan den Bos, 2013 for a meta-analysis) and reading (e.g. Borella & de Ribaupierre, 2014;Chiappe et al, 2000;Passolunghi et al, 2022;see Follmer, 2018 for a meta-analysis), and with specific populations such as ADHD (e.g. Stevens et a., 2022) and autism (e.g.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%