A large body of evidence demonstrates that the processing of numbers and space are tightly related.Today, the dominant explanation for this interaction is the number line hypothesis. This hypothesis claimis that the mental representation of numbers takes the form of a horizontally oriented line which is functionally homeomorphic to the way physical lines are represented. The aim of the present review is twofold. In a first step we review recent evidence on number bisection bias in neglect and on the SNARC effect challenging the homeomorphic relationship between numerical and spatial processing. For the bisection bias we present data that show a clear dissociation between number bisection and physical line bisection. Additionally, we present data on the SNARC effect showing that its origin is of a conceptual rather than visuospatial nature. In a second step, we present data that provide pointers towards a new theoretical framework which proposes that serial position in working memory may be an important determinant of the interactions between number and space.
How number is associated with space? The role of working memoryIt is generally accepted that the cognitive representation and processing of number and space are tightly linked. This is evident from introspective reports, for instance by mathematicians who describe their mathematical thinking as hinging on visual imagery. Also, math instruction and education rely strongly on visuospatial tools and strategies. Remarkably, the involvement of spatial processing in mathematical cognition is not restricted to complex mathematics but even applies to the basic and elementary representation of number.Already in the 1880's Galton [e.g. 1] described the introspective reports of people who experience vivid mental number line images. Later, Seron et al. [2] showed that these were more than incidental observations and confirmed that about 14% of typical student population report mental number lines. Experiences of spatially defined mental number lines can be particularly strong and elaborated in synesthesia [3,4], a condition in which certain types of stimuli give rise to experiences in modalities that are normally not associated with such stimuli, for instance color sensations to number stimuli. Importantly, however, number-space interactions are not restricted to those who have the conscious experience of mental number lines. A number of empirical phenomena demonstrate that the involvement of space is a basic and essential aspect of number representation also in people who do not report having conscious experience of visuospatial number lines when they think about numbers.In a seminal paper, Dehaene et al. [5] showed that, when subjects respond to numbers by pressing a left or a right response key, for instance in a parity judgment task, small numbers are faster responded to with the left hand than with the right hand and that large numbers receive faster right hand than left hand responses. This effect (see Figure 1) indicating a Spatial Numerical Association ...