2002
DOI: 10.1097/00132576-200211000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Wrap Around Services in Retention and Outcome in Substance Abuse Treatment: Findings From the Wrap Around Services Impact Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All procedures were approved by the institutional review board of the St. Francis Medical Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Additional details regarding the WASIS methodology are provided in the work of Pringle et al (2002).…”
Section: Study Design and Subject Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All procedures were approved by the institutional review board of the St. Francis Medical Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Additional details regarding the WASIS methodology are provided in the work of Pringle et al (2002).…”
Section: Study Design and Subject Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After accounting for numerous contingencies, the follow-up rate at 3 months was 65%. The follow-up sample appears to be sufficiently representative of the baseline sample on variables closely related to addiction severity and service needs, including sociodemographic characteristics, employment, and criminal justice status (refer to the work of Pringle et al, 2002 for additional details).…”
Section: Study Design and Subject Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, acute-care models oriented around isolated treatment episodes or focused on core treatment activities to the exclusion of ancillary needs and environmental triggers of relapse are likely to be inappropriate in treating these disorders (McLellan, 2002). The effectiveness of case management in addiction treatment is well established, and other studies, which demonstrate the effectiveness of comprehensive service provision to these populations, suggest that programs that facilitate referral to such services are likely to realize superior client outcomes (McLellan et al, 1998(McLellan et al, , 1999Pringle et al, 2002). Moreover, the results of the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study point to the importance of treatment retention in predicting successful posttreatment outcomes (Hubbard, Craddock, Flynn, Anderson, & Etheridge, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they strongly indicated a need for comparative, longitudinal studies examining wrap-around interventions. Other authors also support the need for ongoing evaluation of collaborative services to children (Bruner et al , 1992;Pringle et al , 2002;Rutman, Hubberstey, Hume, & Tate, 1998;Salmon, 2004). Bruner et al contend that evaluations must be interactive and formative and Nicholson et al (1998) called for more research that includes the client voice in evaluation of practice.…”
Section: Icm: What Helps and What Hinders?mentioning
confidence: 99%