The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition

Abstract

How does the mind produce creative ideas? Past research has pointed to important roles of both executive and associative processes in creative cognition. But such work has largely focused on the influence of one ability or the other-executive or associative-so the extent to which both abilities may jointly affect creative thought remains unclear. Using multivariate structural equation modeling, we conducted two studies to determine the relative influences of executive and associative processes in domain-general creative cognition (i.e., divergent thinking). Participants completed a series of verbal fluency tasks, and their responses were analyzed by means of latent semantic analysis (LSA) and scored for semantic distance as a measure of associative ability. Participants also completed several measures of executive function-including broad retrieval ability (Gr) and fluid intelligence (Gf). Across both studies, we found substantial effects of both associative and executive abilities: As the average semantic distance between verbal fluency responses and cues increased, so did the creative quality of divergent-thinking responses (Study 1 and Study 2). Moreover, the creative quality of divergent-thinking responses was predicted by the executive variables-Gr (Study 1) and Gf (Study 2). Importantly, the effects of semantic distance and the executive function variables remained robust in the same structural equation model predicting divergent thinking, suggesting unique contributions of both constructs. The present research extends recent applications of LSA in creativity research and provides support for the notion that both associative and executive processes underlie the production of novel ideas.

Situative Creativity: Larger Physical Spaces Facilitate Thinking of Novel Uses for Everyday Objects

“…observation is consistent with prior research on the "path of least resistance" in creative production (Ward, 1994), and other work that has shown that instructions to "be creative" can yield substantial improvements to creative output : People generally need to expend cognitive effort to overcome initial biases toward less creative responses (e.g., using cognitive control to inhibit more accessible but less creative responses; Beaty, Silvia, Nusbaum, Jauk, & Benedek, 2014). In light of this, it may be useful to think of these results as describing the effects of room size on "default" problem solving (i.e., when participants are not necessarily actively trying to be creative in their responses).…”

The neuroscience of musical improvisation

“…The extent to which creative thought relies upon such top-down and bottomup processes remains a point of debate in the literature on musical improvisation as well as in the literature on domain-general creative cognition (cf. Abraham, 2014;Beaty et al, 2014c;Jung et al, 2013;McMillan et al, 2013;Mok, 2014;Sowden et al, 2014).…”

Remotely Close Associations: Openness to Experience and Semantic Memory Structure

“…Since Mednick's seminal theory, other theories of creative cognition have emerged, and all suggest the structure of associative memory is critical for creative cognition (Beaty, Silvia, Nusbaum, Jauk, & Benedek, 2014;Gabora, in press;Sowden, world networks-act as "shortcuts" to access remote associations and facilitate the flexible search through possible solutions.…”