The roles of excision repair cross-complementation group1 in objective response after cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy and survival in head and neck cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
“…Low/negative expression of ERCC1 was associated with longer OS and PFS in patients treated with cisplatin-based CRT, but there was no significant difference in ORR between low/negative and high/positive ERCC1 expression [17]. What are differences and similarities between these two meta-analyses and our metaanalysis?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Xuelei et al [16] included in their meta-analysis all studies irrespective of treatment modality, while Gao et al [17] included studies dealing with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. We included all the studies with treatments containing platinum-based chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to address this issue two meta-analyses has been published, one in the patients with HNSCC irrespective of the treatment modalities [16] and one in the patients treated with cisplatin-based concurrent CRT [17]. Since cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the part of different treatment modalities in patients with HNSCC we performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of studies outcomes to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of ERCC1 expression in this category of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, high heterogeneity (I 2 = 80.5%) of the mixed head and neck cancer group was responsible for the lack of the association between ERCC1 expression and OS in that group. Gao et al [17] also reported that ERCC1 expression was a predictor of OS in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although sharing some similarities with the meta-analysis of Gao et al [17] our analysis of adjusted OS estimates included larger sample size of 940 patients from 15 studies while the study of Gao et al [17] included 568 patients from 9 studies.…”
“…Low/negative expression of ERCC1 was associated with longer OS and PFS in patients treated with cisplatin-based CRT, but there was no significant difference in ORR between low/negative and high/positive ERCC1 expression [17]. What are differences and similarities between these two meta-analyses and our metaanalysis?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Xuelei et al [16] included in their meta-analysis all studies irrespective of treatment modality, while Gao et al [17] included studies dealing with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. We included all the studies with treatments containing platinum-based chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to address this issue two meta-analyses has been published, one in the patients with HNSCC irrespective of the treatment modalities [16] and one in the patients treated with cisplatin-based concurrent CRT [17]. Since cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the part of different treatment modalities in patients with HNSCC we performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of studies outcomes to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of ERCC1 expression in this category of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably, high heterogeneity (I 2 = 80.5%) of the mixed head and neck cancer group was responsible for the lack of the association between ERCC1 expression and OS in that group. Gao et al [17] also reported that ERCC1 expression was a predictor of OS in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although sharing some similarities with the meta-analysis of Gao et al [17] our analysis of adjusted OS estimates included larger sample size of 940 patients from 15 studies while the study of Gao et al [17] included 568 patients from 9 studies.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.