2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The roles of lexical tone and rime during Mandarin sentence comprehension: An event-related potential study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, PMN results failed to show significant differences between tone mismatches and real words, suggesting that mismatching vowels may affect ERPs earlier than tones for all listeners. This pattern of results is consistent with several previous studies which provided contextual cues for lexical expectation in phrases or sentences and found reduced N400s for tone mismatches relative to rhyme mismatches (Hu et al, 2012;Pelzl et al, 2021;Zou et al, 2020), though such differences do not always appear (Brown-Schmidt and Canseco-Gonzalez, 2004;Schirmer et al, 2005;Pelzl et al, 2019). On the other hand, as we expected for these correctly judged trials, in the later LPC time window both groups displayed strong positive deflections for tone mismatches relative to the matched word condition.…”
Section: Erpssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…At the same time, PMN results failed to show significant differences between tone mismatches and real words, suggesting that mismatching vowels may affect ERPs earlier than tones for all listeners. This pattern of results is consistent with several previous studies which provided contextual cues for lexical expectation in phrases or sentences and found reduced N400s for tone mismatches relative to rhyme mismatches (Hu et al, 2012;Pelzl et al, 2021;Zou et al, 2020), though such differences do not always appear (Brown-Schmidt and Canseco-Gonzalez, 2004;Schirmer et al, 2005;Pelzl et al, 2019). On the other hand, as we expected for these correctly judged trials, in the later LPC time window both groups displayed strong positive deflections for tone mismatches relative to the matched word condition.…”
Section: Erpssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The altered fundamental frequency caused by CT muscle dysfunction may further impair communication ability, especially in Mandarin, because lexical tone has been reported to be able to influence spoken word recognition in Mandarin significantly [ 30 ]. Zou et al [ 31 ] also found that tone violation can dramatically increase listening comprehension error rates in Mandarin, even more than rhyme violation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimuli containing a vowel mismatch were recognized faster than those containing a lexical tone mismatch in a monitoring task (Ye & Connine, 1999). In a Chinese sentence comprehension task, target words containing rime violations (e.g., 观赚/kuan1 tʂuan4/ "look earn") elicited N400 and P600 of larger amplitudes compared with the congruent condition (e.g., 观众/kuan1 tʂuŋ4/ "audience"), while lexical tone violations (e.g., 观肿/kuan1 tʂuŋ3/ "look swelling") only elicited larger P600, indicating a comparatively later detection of lexical tone violations (Zou et al, 2020). Similar ERP patterns were also observed in the perception of Chinese idioms (Hu et al, 2012;X.…”
Section: Lexical Tone and Vowel Perception In Generalmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the contrary, if the tasks use highly constraining contexts that can easily evoke a top-down influence from the lexical level process to the sub-lexical level process, the processing difference between lexical tones and vowels is eliminated. However, Zou et al (2020) found that even when the target stimuli were presented in sentences that introduced strong semantic contexts, ERP patterns emerged in vowel perception and lexical tone perception still differed a lot. Therefore, the question about holistic/separate process of lexical tones and vowels is still open to be tested.…”
Section: Lexical Tone and Vowel Perception In Generalmentioning
confidence: 95%