The roles of national culture in affecting quality management practices and quality performance - multilevel and multi-country analysis

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates the role of national culture on the implementation and effectiveness of quality management practices. Specifically, the authors examine the dual roles of two of Hofstede's national culture dimensions (individualism and indulgence) in driving the implementation of people management practices and in moderating the relationship between people management and product quality performance.Design/methodology/approachThe authors’ dataset combines a survey of 976 firms from 22 countries with Hofstede's national culture index. A multi-level analysis, at firm and country levels, is used for investigating the interplay between two dimensions of national culture (individualism and indulgence) on people management practices and product quality performance.FindingsThe authors' findings show the negative relationship between indulgence (at country level) and people management practices (at firm level) while individualism (at country level) strengthens the relationship between people management and product quality performance (at firm level). Furthermore, the finding shows that the joint interaction between individualism and indulgence (at country level) moderates the relationship between people management and product quality performance (at firm level) where the relationship is strongest when individualism is high and indulgence is low.Practical implicationsUnderstanding the interplay between national culture and management practices is important for managers in making decisions on the practices managers should implement under different cultural contexts to gain the expected outcomes.Originality/valueThe authors' results challenge the universalist view that suggests that quality management practices (in this case people management practices) can be applied in any context effectively to achieve high product quality performance by showing that facets of national culture influence the implementation and effectiveness of people management practices and performance. The results also provide a fresh perspective on the role of indulgence, given that it is the newest dimension in Hofstede's framework. The authors also extend previous studies which commonly only examine the main and not interactive effects of different dimensions of national culture.

Achieving high performance in healthcare institutions: a longitudinal perspective

“…Openness & Action Orientation). This focus has been a good choice of the institutions, because research has shown that when people get along better with each other in an organisation, that this forms the basis of successful change in that organisation [38,39]. Appendix 2 shows all three institutions have advanced on people being allowed to make mistakes (characteristic 12); being open to change (13); their managers being trusted (15), having integrity (16) and being a role model (17) and a coach to employees (20); and having a diverse workforce (29) in a secure environment (35).…”

Socio-Cultural Factors and Components of the Digital Economy in Ethnic Minority Regions

“…In a study of 42 countries over a 20-year period, Thanetsunthorn [49] found that culture influenced trust in organisational development. Furthermore, research on 976 companies in 22 countries showed that culture influenced quality management and performance [50], whereas research on 191 international firms in 29 countries and five continents found that cultural factors can influence ethical issues [51]. In addition, socio-cultural factors can influence public investment [17], civil unrest [52], labour productivity [16], digitalisation [26], tax compliance [20] and high-tech innovation [25], among others.…”

Drivers of consumer protection practices: implications for operational performance

“…While the unit of analysis for cultural distance could range from individual-to national-level, the focus here is at the national level based on Hofstede's (1984) four dimensions of culture: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism and masculinity (Kaufmann and Carter, 2006). Cultural distance influences the way managers communicate and implement practices, including quality management practices (Prajogo et al, 2022), approaches used when confronting new or challenging problems (Joynt and Warner, 1996), as well as relationships between firms (Gorodnichenko et al, 2023;Thornton et al, 2013). Cultural differences make it more challenging to transfer knowledge and align interests among supply chain members (Liu et al, 2021).…”