The Roles of Perceived Identity Compatibility and Social Support for Women in a Single-Sex STEM Program at a Co-educational University

Abstract

Single-sex programs have been implemented in a variety of educational settings to help promote greater engagement of women in STEM fields. However, the mechanisms through which single-sex programs increase women's engagement in STEM fields are unclear. Drawing from research in social and health psychology, we examined two theoretically-guided predictors of women's sense of belonging in their STEM majors and belonging at the university: perceived identity compatibility between being a woman and being in a STEM field, and perceived social support. Participants were 65 racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse women enrolled in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university in Northeastern United States. Participants completed online surveys before the start of their first year of college, and again at the beginning of their second year of college. Findings from multiple regression analyses support hypotheses that across STEM women's first or transitional year of college, perceived identity compatibility, perceived support from close others, and perceived support from the single-sex program for STEM women were each independently associated with greater sense of belonging in their major. Additionally, perceived identity compatibility and perceived support from the single-sex program were associated with greater sense of belonging at the university. These findings suggest that perceived support from sources such as singlesex programs and perceived compatibility between one's field and being female may sustain women pursuing training in nontraditional fields such as STEM. Continued investigation of these factors may elucidate the impact of single-sex programs and inform interventions to increase the retention of women in STEM.

Paving the way and passing the torch: mentors’ motivation and experience of supporting women in optical engineering

“…Even when individual girls and women do decide to enter engineering for their own reasons in spite of these barriers, the laboratory environment often has a male-dominated atmosphere, which creates the vicious cycle of the image problem (Beddoes 2012, Powell et al 2009, Sørensen 1992, Sanders 1995. Blickenstaff (2005) found that these obstacles remain strong largely due to the bias against women and girls in male-dominated STEM environments and their subsequent marginalisation (Blickenstaff 2005, Rosenthal et al 2011). …”

“…A few research findings have started to emerge showing the quality of science production being improved by addressing gender issues (Castaño and Webster 2011, Le-May Sheffield 2006, Osborne et al 2008, ROSE Project 2007, Schiebinger 2008, Sjøberg and Schreiner 2010, Uriarte et al 2007. A number of case studies have reported the positive effects of programmes successfully tackling gendered academic research cultures (Sible et al 2006, Fox et al 2009, Rhoton 2011 (Yost et al 2010, Rosenthal et al 2011. Furthermore, the importance of women mentoring women for their success in higher education and academic institutions has also been emphasised (Schlegel 2000, Touchton et al 2008.…”

The Influence of Out-of-school High School Experiences on Engineering Identities and Career Choice

“…This environment along with the masculine stereotype of engineering contributes to creating a condition that is particularly unwelcoming to women 45 . This perceived incompatibility between women's gender and STEM identity is one reason researchers cite for the lack of representation of women in STEM fields 46,47 . These women experience heightened stress, tend to doubt their ability to perform, develop negative achievement expectations, and report lower performance, despite previous success in their area of study 48,49 .…”

LEADing The Way: A Review of Engineering Leadership Development Programs

“…Given the underrepresentation of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields 12,13 , universities may benefit from creating programs targeted at females in engineering. The development of these programs may also help limit the feelings of marginalization among female students and increase their social support network 14 . Another program offers a 124 credit hour Bachelors of Science in Engineering Leadership degree.…”