2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa extracellular polysaccharides in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes and nitric oxide induced dispersal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For PAO1 experiments, a nutrient broth (NB) (Difco, BD) stock solution (8 g liter Ϫ1 ) was used to provide an average nutrient concentration of 24 mg liter Ϫ1 . This is a similar concentration to previous biofouling studies in laboratory-scale RO systems (34)(35)(36)(37) . The system was allowed to mix for a further 1.5 h prior to the start of the experiment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For PAO1 experiments, a nutrient broth (NB) (Difco, BD) stock solution (8 g liter Ϫ1 ) was used to provide an average nutrient concentration of 24 mg liter Ϫ1 . This is a similar concentration to previous biofouling studies in laboratory-scale RO systems (34)(35)(36)(37) . The system was allowed to mix for a further 1.5 h prior to the start of the experiment.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A recent study showed that the biofouling rate is dependent on both the quantity of EPS components and the surface coverage of the membrane biofilm, rather than the number of bacterial cells present (34). A lack of biofilm polysaccharides combined with areas of unfouled membrane dramatically reduced any hydraulic resistance to permeate flow, thus delaying the rate of biofouling (34). This study showed similar results, where a reduction in EPS constituents (protein and polysaccharide) and a decreased biofilm surface coverage after NO treatment led to significantly lower biofouling rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, even with continuous dosing, biofouling formation has been observed [2]. In recent years, research studies investigating membrane biofouling control have focused on optimisation of pre-treatment for the limitation of nutrients in feed water [7,11], development of novel membrane materials (chlorine resistant [12] or anti-fouling [13]), determination of novel biocides such as DBNPA [14] or nitric oxide [15] and development of novel biological methods such as inhibition of biofilm growth by quorum sensing, biomass dispersion by cell wall hydrolase or bacteriophage and enzymatic disruption [16,17]. Although some of these novel techniques are promising none of them have proved to dramatically improve biofouling control, and none can be implemented for full-scale plant operation in the medium term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aeruginosa, which is ubiquitous in soil and water, is one of the most prevalent biofouling strains in membrane systems and has been isolated from biofilms on water treatment membranes (12,13,15). It is used as a model bacterium for membrane-fouling studies because of its ability to form biofilms and because the genetic basis of its biofilm formation is well studied (40). Sphingomonads are another key biofouling organism in membrane systems; they colonize membrane and spacer surfaces rapidly and cover them with their extracellular polymeric substances (14).…”
Section: Deleterious Biofilm Formation Is Reduced and Permeate Flux Ismentioning
confidence: 99%