2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
108
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
108
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research had suggested that segmental and suprasemental information play comparable roles in alphabetic languages such as Spanish, Italian, or Dutch, in which minimal stress pairs are prevalent (Koster, & Cutler, 1997;Soto-Faraco et al, 2001;Tagliapietra & Tabossi, 2005). Given the abundance of minimal tone pairs in Chinese and evidence that segmental and tonal information in Chinese also play comparable roles (e.g., Malins & Joanisse, 2010), we hypothesized that both congruent S+T-and S-T+ trials should elicit significant facilitation on the color naming, in addition to the S+T+ trials. If tonal information is poorly represented in the Chinese mental lexicon, as compared to segmental information (e.g., Taft & Chen, 1992), there should be facilitation in the S+T+ and S+T-trials but not the S-T+ trials.…”
Section: Segments and Lexical Tonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research had suggested that segmental and suprasemental information play comparable roles in alphabetic languages such as Spanish, Italian, or Dutch, in which minimal stress pairs are prevalent (Koster, & Cutler, 1997;Soto-Faraco et al, 2001;Tagliapietra & Tabossi, 2005). Given the abundance of minimal tone pairs in Chinese and evidence that segmental and tonal information in Chinese also play comparable roles (e.g., Malins & Joanisse, 2010), we hypothesized that both congruent S+T-and S-T+ trials should elicit significant facilitation on the color naming, in addition to the S+T+ trials. If tonal information is poorly represented in the Chinese mental lexicon, as compared to segmental information (e.g., Taft & Chen, 1992), there should be facilitation in the S+T+ and S+T-trials but not the S-T+ trials.…”
Section: Segments and Lexical Tonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable facilitation was found only when the prime shared both the segment and tone with the target. Moreover, Malins and Joanisse (2010) suggested that tonal and segmental information are accessed concurrently and play comparable roles. Using the eyetracking technique, native Mandarin speakers were asked to select a picture that matched the Chinese word that they heard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native speakers of Mandarin may use the tone contour of a word to quickly constrain the activation of lexical candidates that are segmentally identical, but differ in tone (Cutler and Otake, 1999;Cooper et al, 2002;Lee, 2007;Malins and Joanisse, 2010). For instance, Lee (2007) showed that hearing the Mandarin word lou2 (hall) significantly primed responses to the identical target lou2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malins and Joanisse (2010) presented Mandarin monolinguals with target images (e.g., chuang2, bed) alongside segmentally unique but tonally overlapping competitors (e.g., niu2, cow). They found that the Mandarin speakers were more likely to fixate the competitors than unrelated distractors, based upon the overlapping tonal information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speaker identification and emotional speech recognition systems, as well as speech recognition systems, use different types of speech features which can systematically be divided into segmental and supra-segmental ones [1]. These include traditional features such as linear predictive coefficients, linear prediction cepstral coefficients, mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) [2], or unconventional ones like perceptual linear predictive coefficients, log frequency power coefficients [3], gammatone frequency cepstral coefficients [4], or compact multiclass support vector machines [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%