2010
DOI: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.2.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Roles that Forecast Surprise and Forecast Error Play in Determining Management Forecast Precision

Abstract: SYNOPSIS:Studying the determinants of management forecast precision is important because a better understanding of the factors affecting management's choice of forecast precision can provide investors and other users with cues about the characteristics of the information contained in the forecasts. In addition, as regulators assess the regulation of voluntary management disclosures, they need to better understand how managers choose among forecast precision disclosure alternatives. Using 16,872 management earn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Karamanou and Vafeas [] find that more effective boards and audit committees are associated with less precise forecasts. Skinner [] and Choi et al [] find that management forecasts of negative news are less precise. Finally, Cheng, Luo, and Yue [] show that managers choose forecast precision strategically to maximize insider trading profits.…”
Section: Literature Review and Empirical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Karamanou and Vafeas [] find that more effective boards and audit committees are associated with less precise forecasts. Skinner [] and Choi et al [] find that management forecasts of negative news are less precise. Finally, Cheng, Luo, and Yue [] show that managers choose forecast precision strategically to maximize insider trading profits.…”
Section: Literature Review and Empirical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skinner [] finds that bad news forecasts are less precise and Choi et al [] show that the more negative the bad news, the lower the precision. Our study differs from Skinner [] and Choi et al [] by examining the effect of an exogenous change in price sensitivity to bad news instead of the effect of bad news per se on forecast precision. Moreover, our setting of a natural experiment can provide important causal implications.…”
Section: Literature Review and Empirical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers issue less precise forecasts when they are more uncertain about the accuracy of their forecasts (Baginski et al 1993;Choi et al 2010). Thus, investors are likely less able to interpret the information in imprecise forecasts and are less likely to understand their implications for future earnings.…”
Section: The Effect Of Forecast Frequency On the Fercmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, more precise forecasts should reveal more about management's expectations (Choi et al 2010;Karamanou and Vafeas 2005) and allow investors to better predict future earnings. Our third alternative hypothesis is:…”
Section: The Effect Of Forecast Frequency On the Fercmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publicly-traded companies often attempt to meet or beat analyst expectations in hopes of generating a greater than expected stock price increase (Choi et al, 2010;de Jong et al, 2012). The pressure to meet or beat analyst expectations may result in pressure from senior management when the bottom line number generated by the financial close process is not the expected number.…”
Section: Need To Meet (Or Beat) Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%