The Rossby Centre Regional Climate model RCA3: model description and performance

Abstract

A B S T R A C T This paper describes the third full release of the Rossby Centre Regional Climate model (RCA3), with an emphasis on changes compared to earlier versions, in particular the introduction of a new tiled land-surface scheme. The model performance over Europe when driven at the boundaries by ERA40 reanalysis is discussed and systematic biases identified. This discussion is performed for key near-surface variables, such as temperature, precipitation, wind speed and snow amounts at both seasonal and daily timescales. An analysis of simulated clouds and surface turbulent and radiation fluxes is also made, to understand the causes of the identified biases. RCA3 shows equally good, or better, correspondence to observations than previous model versions at both analysed timescales. The primary model bias relates to an underestimate of the diurnal surface temperature range over Northern Europe, which maximizes in summer. This error is mainly linked to an overestimate of soil heat flux. It is shown that the introduction of an organic soil component reduces the error significantly. During the summer season, precipitation and surface evaporation are both overestimated over Northern Europe, whereas for most other regions and seasons precipitation and surface turbulent fluxes are well simulated.

Impact of Climate Change on Ecological Quality Indicators and Biogeochemical Fluxes in the Baltic Sea: A Multi-Model Ensemble Study

“…A thorough comparison of hindcast simulation results of the three biogeochemical models driven with regionalized ERA-40 re-analysis data (Samuelsson et al 2011(Samuelsson et al ) during 1970(Samuelsson et al -2005 was performed by Eilola et al (2011). Eilola et al (2011) concluded that the models capture much of the observed variability and that during 1970-2005, the response to changing physical conditions is simulated realistically.…”

Climate impact on floods: changes in high flows in Sweden in the past and the future (1911–2100)

“…Bosshard et al (2014) considered all possible selections of two projections from this ensemble and noted that the chosen projections spanned a larger uncertainty range than at least 70 % of the other combinations. Both projections simulated effects of the A1B emission scenario (Nakićenović et al, 2000), and the GCM results were dynamically downscaled to 50 km using the regional climate model (RCM) called RCA3 (Samuelsson et al, 2011). Thereafter, daily surface temperatures (at 2 m) and precipitation were further downscaled to 4 km, and bias was corrected using the distribution-based scaling method (Yang et al, 2010) with reference data from the 4 km grid-based observations for 1981-2010.…”

Sensitivity of the overturning circulation of the Baltic Sea to climate change, a numerical experiment

“…Lately, one can cite (Schimanke et al 2014) who used a EOF decomposition of atmospheric pressure over Northern Europe to identify the atmospheric patterns that create MBIs. Based on this decomposition and using five different climate scenarios (Samuelsson et al 2011), they have forecasted an increase of MBIs in the Baltic Sea towards the end of the 21st century. However, their study was only based on atmospheric patterns and did not include an ocean model.…”