1976
DOI: 10.2307/2110567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Routinization of Committee Assignments in the U. S. House of Representatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Legislators request committee assignments, and the party grants their requests (see Smith &Deering 1984: 239, andShepsle (1978). Gertzog (1976) found that 90% of new members in the House were granted their committee requests within three terms. However, everyone cannot get the seats they desire.…”
Section: Brief Literature Review On Committee Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Legislators request committee assignments, and the party grants their requests (see Smith &Deering 1984: 239, andShepsle (1978). Gertzog (1976) found that 90% of new members in the House were granted their committee requests within three terms. However, everyone cannot get the seats they desire.…”
Section: Brief Literature Review On Committee Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researchers of congressional processes have argued that, although congressional parties formally make committee assignments, individual member preferences dominate in the process, and parties merely accommodate those preferences with little consideration for party goals (Gertzog 1976;Shepsle 1978;Smith and Ray 1983;Westfield 1974). This article, however, takes as its main view that parties in Congress play pivotal roles in the selection of members of committees.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matching of assignments to requests, constrained only by scarcity, is both a guiding principle and an accurate description of the committee assignment process. (1978: 238) , Shepsle's impressive data set and its rigorous analysis, including estimates of statistical models, together with earlier findings by Gertzog (1976) and Westefield (1974) and more recent work by Bullock (1985), provide strong support for the appropriateness of an accommodation leadership strategy in congressional committee appointments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%