The Russian Revolution: Broadening Understandings of 1917

Abstract

The rich historiography of the revolution has tended to focus around urban and political elites, labour history and events in Petrograd and to a lesser extent Moscow. The collapse of the Soviet Union opened previously inaccessible archives and shifted the ideological battlegrounds ranged over by scholars of the Russian revolution. New archivally based research is shifting its focus away from the capitals and political elites, and draws together social and political approaches to the revolution. By investigating revolutionary events outside the capitals, and lived experiences of revolution for Russia's ordinary people, most of whom were rural, not urban dwellers, current research draws a complex and multifaceted picture of revolutionary events. Explanations for the failure of democratic politics in Russia can now be found not only in the ineptitudes of Nicholas II, the failings of Kerensky, or the machinations of Lenin and his cohort. Instead, ordinary people, outside the capitals and in the countryside, defined and determined revolutionary events.

Deconstruction of Natural Order. The Legacy of the Russian Revolution

“…С другой -растущая доля нерусских жителей Федерации может ослабить революционный потенциал. of society, tensions between people's needs and actual possibilities of satisfying those needs, relative deprivations, social, economic, and political grievances (Sargeant, 1997;Badcock, 2008;Mironov, 2015, p. 89). The works claim that disorientation, dysregulation, disorganization, and the intensification of tensions increased the level of deviant and protest behavior (Mironov, 2015, p. 89;Rendle and Retish, 2017).…”