2021
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.654460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sabatier Principle in Electrocatalysis: Basics, Limitations, and Extensions

Abstract: The Sabatier principle, which states that the binding energy between the catalyst and the reactant should be neither too strong nor too weak, has been widely used as the key criterion in designing and screening electrocatalytic materials necessary to promote the sustainability of our society. The widespread success of density functional theory (DFT) has made binding energy calculations a routine practice, turning the Sabatier principle from an empirical principle into a quantitative predictive tool. Given its … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
202
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 207 publications
(294 reference statements)
4
202
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[34][35][36][37] However, for those electrochemial interfacial systems in which hydrogen adsorbate phases exhibit a Nernstian behavior or in which the stability of non-hydrogen adsorption phases does not depend on pH, it can in principle safely be assumed that the free energy difference ∆G ads H (T, U, pH) does not depend on the electrochemical control parameters, so that this difference can be replaced by the difference in the respective total energies. This also provides an explanation why the typical approximation applied when doing calculations of electrochemical interfaces using the concept of the computational hydrogen electrode , 28,[38][39][40][41][42][43] namely to neglect the influence of electrode potential and pH when calculating the energy of the adsorbate phases, has often yielded results that agree rather nicely with the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[34][35][36][37] However, for those electrochemial interfacial systems in which hydrogen adsorbate phases exhibit a Nernstian behavior or in which the stability of non-hydrogen adsorption phases does not depend on pH, it can in principle safely be assumed that the free energy difference ∆G ads H (T, U, pH) does not depend on the electrochemical control parameters, so that this difference can be replaced by the difference in the respective total energies. This also provides an explanation why the typical approximation applied when doing calculations of electrochemical interfaces using the concept of the computational hydrogen electrode , 28,[38][39][40][41][42][43] namely to neglect the influence of electrode potential and pH when calculating the energy of the adsorbate phases, has often yielded results that agree rather nicely with the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Yet, according to Sabatier principle there is a relationship between the catalyst activity and the strength a substrate adsorbs to a surface. It states that the binding energy between the catalyst’s surface and the substrate should not be too strong or too weak ( Ooka et al, 2021 ). Hence, as the d -band center suggests how strong an adsorption would occur, it can be useful for indicating which nanocluster would show a better catalytic activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a simple 2 electron transfer reaction like HER, the free energy of only one intermediate, that is, surface adsorbed hydrogen, depends upon the catalyst surface on which it is adsorbed. [110] The elementary charge transfer steps of the HER can be written as shown in Scheme 3. [139] If we assume that the reaction may only proceed if all the steps are thermodynamically favorable, then the role of catalyst is to reduce the driving force for the least favorable step.…”
Section: Gibbs Free Energymentioning
confidence: 99%