1999
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/18.20.5714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MER3 gene, encoding a novel helicase-like protein, is required for crossover control in meiosis

Abstract: The MER3 gene is identified as a novel meiosis-specific gene, whose transcript is spliced in an MRE2/MER1-dependent manner. The predicted Mer3 protein contains the seven motifs characteristic of the DExHbox type of helicases as well as a putative zinc finger. Double strand breaks (DSBs), the initial changes of DNA in meiotic recombination, do not disappear completely and are hyperresected late in mer3 meiosis, indicating that MER3 is required for the transition of DSBs to later intermediates. A mer3 mutation r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
138
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
12
138
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mer1 protein binds directly to an element found in the regulated introns of target genes and in the absence of MER1 these genes are not spliced (Nandabalan et al 1993;Spingola and Ares 2000). Four direct targets of Mer1 have been identified: MER2, MER3, SPO22, and AMA1 (Engebrecht et al 1991;Nakagawa and Ogawa 1999;Cooper et al 2000;Davis et al 2000;Spingola and Ares 2000). SPO22 and MER3 are both early genes induced by Ume6/Ime1, while MER2 is constitutively transcribed, but unspliced, in vegetative cells (Engebrecht et al 1991;Munding et al 2010).…”
Section: Key Events In the Phases Of Sporulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mer1 protein binds directly to an element found in the regulated introns of target genes and in the absence of MER1 these genes are not spliced (Nandabalan et al 1993;Spingola and Ares 2000). Four direct targets of Mer1 have been identified: MER2, MER3, SPO22, and AMA1 (Engebrecht et al 1991;Nakagawa and Ogawa 1999;Cooper et al 2000;Davis et al 2000;Spingola and Ares 2000). SPO22 and MER3 are both early genes induced by Ume6/Ime1, while MER2 is constitutively transcribed, but unspliced, in vegetative cells (Engebrecht et al 1991;Munding et al 2010).…”
Section: Key Events In the Phases Of Sporulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this view, none of the eight chromosome III disomes was recombinant. In the absence of Mlh1, Mlh3, Msh4, Msh5, Zip1, Zip2, and Mer3, crossing over is reduced twofold to threefold during meiosis, leading to abnormal reductional division (Ross and Roeder, 1994;Sym and Roeder, 1994;Hollingsworth et al, 1995;Hunter and Borts, 1997;Chua and Roeder, 1998;Nakagawa and Ogawa, 1999;Wang et al, 1999). Mlh1, Mlh3, Msh4, and Msh5 are homologues of mismatch repair proteins, and both Mlh1 and Mlh3, like Exo1, are also required for mismatch correction; thus, a close mechanistic correlation between mismatch repair and crossing over is suggested.…”
Section: Exo1 and Crossing Over During Meiosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene conversion has no significant role in segregation (Roeder, 1997). A mutation in any one of a group of genes (ZIP1, ZIP2, MSH4, MSH5, MLH1, MLH3, and MER3) reduces crossing over (Ross and Roeder, 1994;Sym and Roeder, 1994;Hollingsworth et al, 1995;Hunter and Borts, 1997;Chua and Roeder, 1998;Nakagawa and Ogawa, 1999;Wang et al, 1999). Among these, MSH4, MSH5, MLH1, and MLH3 are homologues of the mismatch repair proteins of E. coli, suggesting a mechanistic relationship between mismatch repair and crossing over .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In budding yeast, SPO11 functions in the generation of DSBs [23,24]. MSH4, MSH5 and MER3 are required for normal crossover formation [25][26][27][28]. MER3 is a DNA helicase and is important for extension of the DNA heteroduplex in the second end capture (SEC) intermediate [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the distributions of the remaining chiasmata in the mutants are not statistically different from predicted Poisson distributions, suggesting that the formation of the remaining crossovers is not sensitive to interference. However, the wild-type chiasma distribution is dramatically different from the Poisson distribution, demonstrating that budding yeast and Arabidopsis both possess two genetically distinct pathways for crossover formation: a major interference-sensitive pathway dependent on MSH4/5 and MER3 proteins and a minor interference-insensitive pathway that is independent of these proteins [26,[37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%