2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40061-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Safe Day Call: Reducing Silos in Health Care Through Frontline Risk Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PSO safety huddles are a variation on the daily safety brief held by many participating hospitals and a novel example of a safe table. 20 Designed to broaden and hasten opportunities for shared risk identification, participants voluntarily ask for help or report a risk warning to other organizations. These early warnings have involved device- and medication-related harm or near misses, outbreak trends, various process failures, unanticipated communication breakdown, and safety challenges associated with COVID response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PSO safety huddles are a variation on the daily safety brief held by many participating hospitals and a novel example of a safe table. 20 Designed to broaden and hasten opportunities for shared risk identification, participants voluntarily ask for help or report a risk warning to other organizations. These early warnings have involved device- and medication-related harm or near misses, outbreak trends, various process failures, unanticipated communication breakdown, and safety challenges associated with COVID response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSO safety huddles are a variation on the daily safety brief held by many participating hospitals and a novel example of a safe table. 20 Designed to broaden and hasten opportunities for shared risk Fig. 1.…”
Section: Safe Tables "Safe Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mature culture of safety focuses on the system and the impact on people, elevating psychological safety, concentrating on why the event occurred within that environment; and why the established redundancies within the system were not effective in aborting the event. Changing the culture of safety where the outcome (harm) is not the center of the investigation to one where the investigative questions move away from what happened and who was involved, increases the trust in the evaluation process and decreases the fear of participating in the event assessment [53]. Emphasizing on the individual participants and not the system assessment results in further degradation of the culture, prevents people from speaking up, and leads to more cover-ups due to concerns of being labeled as incompetent as well as enhances the fear of retaliation.…”
Section: Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%