2017
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170411-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Safe Zone” Technique Improves Suture Placement and Accuracy During Arthroscopic Remplissage

Abstract: In response to recent concerns about the accuracy of suture passage during arthroscopic remplissage, this study was conducted to determine whether a previously described "safe zone" technique can improve the accuracy of suture passage. A recommended safe zone technique was used for arthroscopic remplissage on 6 cadaveric specimens. The safe zone was described as a region at least 1 cm lateral and no greater than 3 cm distal to the posterolateral acromion. Results were compared with a control group of 6 specime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,22,[27][28][29] Pain, mainly in the posterosuperior region of the shoulder, is also a potential drawback of the remplissage procedure. 24,[30][31][32] The purpose of our study is to demonstrate whether arthroscopic remplissage can achieve good outcomes without significantly impairing shoulder function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,22,[27][28][29] Pain, mainly in the posterosuperior region of the shoulder, is also a potential drawback of the remplissage procedure. 24,[30][31][32] The purpose of our study is to demonstrate whether arthroscopic remplissage can achieve good outcomes without significantly impairing shoulder function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this can be minimized by placing the anchor in the safe zone at least 1 cm lateral and no greater than 3 cm distal to the acromion, and avoiding over medialization. 50 Therefore, future biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to ascertain how the various operative techniques impact throwing motions or the sport-specific overhead abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it was agreed that external range of motion loss is unlikely to be clinically significant but can be minimized by tenodesing the infraspinatus and posterior capsule within its safe-zone and not overmedializing the fixation. 54,55 Furthermore, it was agreed that there was no optimal fixation method and that if knotted anchors were used, they did not need to be tied under direct visualization. Finally, there was strong consensus agreement that a remplissage procedure need not alter the rehabilitation protocol of an isolated Bankart repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%