2020
DOI: 10.2174/1874210602014010563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Safety and Efficacy of Pre- and Post-Medication for Postoperative Endo- dontic Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Postoperative Endodontic Pain is a major concern for dentists and their patients, with pain having been reported to occur in 25%–40% of patients treated. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and Network Meta-analysis (NMA) was to identify the safety and efficacy of pre- and post-medication for reducing postoperative endodontic pain. Methods: A literature search was performed in the SCOPUS, MEDLINE,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several Systematic reviews reported that the preoperative use of a single dose of NSAIDs such as Ibuprofen, Tenoxicam, Rofecoxib, Etodolac, Piroxicam, Ketoprofen, Diflunisal, Fast acting ibuprofen, Flurbiprofen, Naproxen, Lornoxicam, Celecoxib, Ketorolac, Mefenamic acid, Endomethacin, Diclofenac, and Nemosulide are effective in reducing the post-operative pain ( 28,29,30,31,32,13) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several Systematic reviews reported that the preoperative use of a single dose of NSAIDs such as Ibuprofen, Tenoxicam, Rofecoxib, Etodolac, Piroxicam, Ketoprofen, Diflunisal, Fast acting ibuprofen, Flurbiprofen, Naproxen, Lornoxicam, Celecoxib, Ketorolac, Mefenamic acid, Endomethacin, Diclofenac, and Nemosulide are effective in reducing the post-operative pain ( 28,29,30,31,32,13) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst the 12 reviews, ten included clinical trials, and two included laboratory-based studies. The software used to conduct the individual NMAs were WinBUGS (Lin et al, 2014), STATA (Nagendrababu et al, 2019a(Nagendrababu et al, , 2019b, program R (Zanjir et al, 2019(Zanjir et al, , 2020, MetaXL (Sivaramakrishnan et al, (2019) and R version (Almuthhin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall confidence in the results of the reviews is described in Table 2. The overall confidence in the results of eight reviews were categorized as 'Critically low' (Almuthhin et al, 2020;Dioguardi et al, 2021;Lin et al, 2014;Sivaramakrishnan et al, 2019;de Souza Matos et al, 2021;Tedesco et al, 2020;Zanjir et al, 2019Zanjir et al, , 2020, one review was 'Low' (Nagendrababu et al, 2019b), two reviews were 'Moderate' (Nagendrababu et al, 2019a;Pulikkotil et al, 2018) and one review was 'High' (Khater et al, 2021).…”
Section: Overall Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%