2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further recent meta-analysis study, performed to verify whether the use of GLP-1 RAs in patients with HF with or without type 2 diabetes could improve morbidity and mortality compared to placebo treatment, also demonstrated that the GLP-1 RAs did not lead to an improvement in major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular mortality, or a reduction in hospitalizations for HF. Furthermore, they did not determine an improvement in EF and in the six-minute walking test [72].…”
Section: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A further recent meta-analysis study, performed to verify whether the use of GLP-1 RAs in patients with HF with or without type 2 diabetes could improve morbidity and mortality compared to placebo treatment, also demonstrated that the GLP-1 RAs did not lead to an improvement in major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular mortality, or a reduction in hospitalizations for HF. Furthermore, they did not determine an improvement in EF and in the six-minute walking test [72].…”
Section: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Another recent meta-analysis carried out on 54,092 pts from 7 randomized controlled trials on the use of GLP-1 Ras in subjects with type 2 diabetes, of whom 16% also had a history of HF, demonstrated that these drugs appear to protect the diabetic population from the development of HF, but, in subjects with pre-existing HF, they do not reduce the onset of episodes of HF exacerbation with consequent hospitalization, nor mortality ( 73 ). A further recent meta-analysis carried out to verify whether treatment with GLP-1 Ras in subjects with HF, with or without type 2 diabetes, could lead to a reduction in morbidity and mortality compared to placebo, also demonstrated that this therapy did not reduce the number of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular mortality or reduction in hospital admissions for HF, and did not lead to an improvement in HF or six-minute walking test ( 74 ).…”
Section: Tratment Of Ir/hyperinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Merza et al noted that compared with a placebo, the controversial medicine GLP-1 RAs did not increase the risk of experiencing MACEs ( 80 ). However, in his study, Merza et al assembled only 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing only 871 participants, which is small for a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%