2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The safety and efficacy of relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection or complicated urinary tract infection: A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative phase 3 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A phase 3 non-randomized, not controlled, open-label clinical study investigated the safety and efficacy of imipenem/relebactam in 81 Japanese subjects with cIAIs or cUTIs (14 bacteremic, 7 septic). Microorganisms were mostly non-MDR, and the results were in line with registration studies, showing comparable favorable efficacy and safety [137]. The microbiological features of the study may not add informative data for MDR pathogens.…”
Section: Imipenem/relebactamsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A phase 3 non-randomized, not controlled, open-label clinical study investigated the safety and efficacy of imipenem/relebactam in 81 Japanese subjects with cIAIs or cUTIs (14 bacteremic, 7 septic). Microorganisms were mostly non-MDR, and the results were in line with registration studies, showing comparable favorable efficacy and safety [137]. The microbiological features of the study may not add informative data for MDR pathogens.…”
Section: Imipenem/relebactamsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Briefly, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive IPM/cilastatin/REL 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, adjusted for renal function (Table S2), every 6 h; efficacy end points included day 28 all‐cause mortality and clinical response 7–14 days after completing therapy 14 . In addition to PN014, data from another global, phase III study completed after finalization of the previous PopPK model, PN017 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03293485; protocol MK‐7655A‐017 [PN017]), were added to this analysis 22 . Additional details regarding the PN014 methodology and the PopPK dataset can be found in the Supplementary Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 In addition to PN014, data from another global, phase III study completed after finalization of the previous PopPK model, PN017 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03293485; protocol MK‐7655A‐017 [PN017]), were added to this analysis. 22 Additional details regarding the PN014 methodology and the PopPK dataset can be found in the Supplementary Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, carbapenem and non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors, such as imipenem-relebactam, have been found to be effective against most strains of CR-KP and clinical trials show favorable responses to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam. 8 , 9 However, the in vivo study of imipenem-relebactam against CREs still showed poor activity against 23 metallo-carbapenemase producers out of 660 isolates. 9 An analysis of CR-KP strains in Chongqing, China, found that among carbapenems, 100% of the CR-KP isolates were resistant to ertapenem, 37.2% were resistant to imipenem, 30.8% were resistant to meropenem 2 Resistance to cephalosporins were relatively high among 52.5%, 75.6% and 78.2% isolates against cefepime, CAZ and ceftriaxone, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%