2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04204-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The safety and efficacy of CO2 laser in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
28
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaginal application of CO 2 laser has been recently introduced for medical conditions related to the vaginal epithelium. Most of the studies on vaginal CO 2 laser have been performed for various symptoms under the newly defined broad term “genitourinary syndrome of menopause” (GSM) [7–9] and very few have assessed the efficacy in patients with SUI [10–14]. The promising outcome of SUI treatment in these prospective studies was short term, namely 3–4 months [14], 6 months [13], or slightly longer [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vaginal application of CO 2 laser has been recently introduced for medical conditions related to the vaginal epithelium. Most of the studies on vaginal CO 2 laser have been performed for various symptoms under the newly defined broad term “genitourinary syndrome of menopause” (GSM) [7–9] and very few have assessed the efficacy in patients with SUI [10–14]. The promising outcome of SUI treatment in these prospective studies was short term, namely 3–4 months [14], 6 months [13], or slightly longer [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies on vaginal CO 2 laser have been performed for various symptoms under the newly defined broad term “genitourinary syndrome of menopause” (GSM) [7–9] and very few have assessed the efficacy in patients with SUI [10–14]. The promising outcome of SUI treatment in these prospective studies was short term, namely 3–4 months [14], 6 months [13], or slightly longer [11,12]. In addition, most of these studies lack well‐accepted objective outcome measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al [26] included 31 women in the study; 21 were treated with Er:YAG and 10 women with CO 2 laser and both treatment protocols seemed to be useful for the improvement of SUI symptoms. Dabaja et al [13] studied 33 women and besides the ICIQ UI SF score, they also analyzed sanitary pad usage, which decreased from 12/day at the baseline to 7/day 1–3 months after treatment ( P < 0.0001), but returned to 12 pad/day 6 months after the treatment. The ICIQ scores improved significantly at 1–3 months after treatment and returned baseline levels at 6 months after the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have referred to the use of nonablative Er:YAG laser for the treatment of SUI [7–9], and one study specified its use for SUI and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) [10]. CO 2 lasers have been commonly used in clinical practice; however, recently, they have been found to be a valid treatment option for SUI as well [11–14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide approach to the treatment of symptoms, often in a stepwise fashion, including lifestyle changes, bladder retraining and pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation, drug therapy, intra-vesical botulinum toxin injections or neuromodulation. Recently vaginal laser therapy has been proposed as an emerging minimal invasive effective treatment option for women with OAB [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%