2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Safety of Bypass to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Facility by Basic Life Support Providers in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Prehospital Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While doubtless further programmatic analysis is required for many of the specific programmes described, the current practices show promise. In the case of bypass to alternate care destinations, there is evidence for safe and effective bypass by paramedics to alternate care destinations for conditions such as heart attacks (STEMI) (Cheskes et al, 2011;Froats et al, 2018) and stroke (Stiell et al 2017). While crisis response teams vary in their format and require further study, there has been some study of such teams and indication that an interagency response model has potential to be preferable for crisis response (Boscarato et al, 2014;Choi et al, 2019;Watson & Compton, 2019).…”
Section: Tensions Between Frontline Work and System Level Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While doubtless further programmatic analysis is required for many of the specific programmes described, the current practices show promise. In the case of bypass to alternate care destinations, there is evidence for safe and effective bypass by paramedics to alternate care destinations for conditions such as heart attacks (STEMI) (Cheskes et al, 2011;Froats et al, 2018) and stroke (Stiell et al 2017). While crisis response teams vary in their format and require further study, there has been some study of such teams and indication that an interagency response model has potential to be preferable for crisis response (Boscarato et al, 2014;Choi et al, 2019;Watson & Compton, 2019).…”
Section: Tensions Between Frontline Work and System Level Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Additionally, other studies rely on the monitor's analysis of the 12L-ECG, 6,8 whereas this county-wide program utilizes the real-time transmission of the 12L-ECG to a physician, which although more vulnerable to techni-cal difficulties, allows for greater interpretational nuance than most software programs. 9 Despite these operational challenges, this is the largest study published to date, [6][7][8] and the only one which uses a single physician, blinded to patient outcome, to evaluate the diagnostic quality of the transmitted 12L-ECGs. 6,7 Of the 12L-ECGs acquired by EMTs, 96% of those available for review were of diagnostic quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 After a search for peer-reviewed, published literature describing EMT acquisition of 12L-ECGs, it seems that qualifying research is limited to two feasibility studies 6,7 and an evaluation of the safety of EMTs bypassing local community hospitals for a PCI-center in rural Canada. 8 Therefore, the objective of this retrospective observational study was to describe the impact of EMT-acquired 12L-ECGs in Suffolk County, New York, both in terms of the diagnostic quality of the transmitted 12L-ECGs and the number of prehospital PCI-center notifications made as a result of transmitted 12L-ECGs demonstrating a STEMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%