2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sagittarius dwarf galaxy as a microlensing target

Abstract: Abstract. We estimate the optical depth, time-scale distribution and fraction of microlensing events originating from sources in the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy (Sgr) lensed by deflectors in the Milky Way. These events have a time-scale longer by a factor ∼1.3 than the MW/MW events and occur mainly on sources fainter than V ∼ 21 mag below Sgr's turn off. The fraction of events involving a source in Sgr depends on the location and extinction of the field and on the limiting magnitude of the survey. The contributio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the microlensing rate for Sgr sources behind our fields is a factor of $6 larger than for bulge source stars (Cseresnjes & Alard 2001), and the fraction of Sgr events with detectable microlensing parallax signals is a factor of 3 larger for sources in Sgr than for bulge sources. Thus, it would appear that the probability of detecting a microlensing parallax event for an Sgr source is a factor of $20 higher than for a bulge source (assuming that the sources are bright enough for reasonably accurate photometry).…”
Section: Microlensing Parallax Selection Effectsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the microlensing rate for Sgr sources behind our fields is a factor of $6 larger than for bulge source stars (Cseresnjes & Alard 2001), and the fraction of Sgr events with detectable microlensing parallax signals is a factor of 3 larger for sources in Sgr than for bulge sources. Thus, it would appear that the probability of detecting a microlensing parallax event for an Sgr source is a factor of $20 higher than for a bulge source (assuming that the sources are bright enough for reasonably accurate photometry).…”
Section: Microlensing Parallax Selection Effectsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, for black holes, the evidence indicates that significant kick velocities are rare (Nelemans, Tauris, & van den Heuvel 1999). As an example of such an analysis, let us suppose that the disk and bulge velocity dispersions were negligible relative to the 24 A previous estimate of lensing rates for Sgr source stars has been made by Cseresnjes & Alard (2001), who find a smaller ratio of Sgr/bulge source lensing events than our estimate. This is because they do not consider only microlensing parallax events and because they count the much more numerous events with bulge main-sequence source stars.…”
Section: Likelihood Distance and Mass Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The mean stellar density and the central coordinates for each area are shown in the panels. Area #1 contains not only MW stars, but also the core of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, in a small proportion of ∼1 : 1000 stars, according with Cseresnjes et al (2000).…”
Section: Slicing the Vvv Bulge Cmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sagittarius events are very important because their identification would mean a change in the determination for the bulge optical depth τ (Cserenjes & Alard 2001) and therefore the angle assumed for the bar inside the galactic bulge. Sagittarius events with detectable parallax have 20 times greater probability of being observed (Bennett et al 2002) detectable parallax.…”
Section: Description Of Derived Light Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%