2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Salmonella mutagenicity of water and sediments from the Porsuk River in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Desta forma, considerando que outros trabalhos comprovam a atividade citotóxica e mutagênica de amostras de rios que sofrem com descarga de efluentes industriais e domésticos (GANA et al, 2008;KUTLU et al, 2004), outros estudos podem ser realizados na região do Rio do Peixe-SP, com a finalidade de monitorar a citotoxicidade e mutagenicidade dessas águas, em diferentes estações do ano.…”
Section: Ponto Deunclassified
“…Desta forma, considerando que outros trabalhos comprovam a atividade citotóxica e mutagênica de amostras de rios que sofrem com descarga de efluentes industriais e domésticos (GANA et al, 2008;KUTLU et al, 2004), outros estudos podem ser realizados na região do Rio do Peixe-SP, com a finalidade de monitorar a citotoxicidade e mutagenicidade dessas águas, em diferentes estações do ano.…”
Section: Ponto Deunclassified
“…A sample was considered positive when the MI was equal to or greater than 2 for at least one of the tested doses and if it had a reproducible dose-response 21) . Several authors have used this parameter in their works [22][23][24][25] . According to Mortelmans and Zeiger 26) , in an important review of the Ames test a widely used approach is to analyze the results and to set a minimum fold increase, usually 2-3 folds, in revertants (over the solvent control) as a cut-off between mutagenic and nonmutagenic responses.…”
Section: Mutagenicity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that the Ames test was to identify the most significant sites for initial assessment of the basin presence of mutagenic compounds (Vargas et al, 1993). Ames test was performed on water and sediment samples from Porsuk River without metabolic activation using TA98 and TA100 strains and found mutagenic and toxic effects with both strains at 5 different concentrations and in different sampling sites (Kutlu et al, 2004). One study in India reported the extracts of the Penobscot River water and sediments and Penobscot drinking water had little to no mutagenic activity using the Salmonella mutagenicity assay detects (Warren et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying the pollution, especially if caused by organic chemicals, is not economically and practically cost-effective due to the complex molecular structure of organic chemicals in the aquatic environment. Among these pollutants, the detection of mutagenes in aquatic environment is of great importance because of their abilities to induce cancer and potential damage to the germ line, which may lead to fertility problems and genetic damages among the future generations (Kutlu et al, 2004). Therefore, short-term bioassays coupled with chemical analysis are a valuable technique to assessing toxic components in environmental samples (Schuetzle and Lewtas, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%