2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13592-011-0112-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The same, but different: pollen foraging in honeybee and bumblebee colonies

Abstract: Like many other bees worldwide, honeybees and bumblebees are threatened by human-induced disturbances. Yet some species decline and others thrive, likely due to different foraging strategies. As little is known about how resource intake translates into nutrients available to colonies, our study aimed to better understand how differences in foraging strategies may affect colony health by relating differences in pollen spectra collected to differences in nutrient composition. The Apis and Bombus colonies studied… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
218
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
17
218
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field, we observed bees antennating pollen, potentially assessing its quality. Bumble bees appear to determine pollen quality by its protein content through tactile chemoreceptors and show preferences for high-protein pollen (26,52), whereas honey bees do not appear to share the same preference (25,29,30). Although both species may be sensitive to protein quality, the preferences observed in previous studies may reflect species-specific differences in nutritional requirements for protein and lipids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the field, we observed bees antennating pollen, potentially assessing its quality. Bumble bees appear to determine pollen quality by its protein content through tactile chemoreceptors and show preferences for high-protein pollen (26,52), whereas honey bees do not appear to share the same preference (25,29,30). Although both species may be sensitive to protein quality, the preferences observed in previous studies may reflect species-specific differences in nutritional requirements for protein and lipids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While foraging in the same landscape, bumble bees foraged preferentially on plant species with higher protein content than did honey bees (25), suggesting species-specific differences in protein acquisition. Bumble bee workers can taste and discriminate among diets with different protein or pollen concentrations (26), and their foraging activity has been positively correlated with pollen protein content using modified (diluted with cellulose powder) single-source pollen diets (27,28) or a single plant species in which pollen protein content varied with soil conditions (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A potential explanation for their importance may be that Fabaceae pollen is richer in protein compared to pollen of other plant families, as suggested by Goulson et al (2005) and Hanley et al (2008). The differential importance of different plant families/species can thus likely be explained by differences in the plants' nectar or pollen quality, as bumble bees appear to require pollen of high protein content (Leonhardt and Blüthgen 2012), which was found to increase their survival and immunocompetence (Genissel et al 2002;Tasei and Aupinel 2008;Brunner et al 2014). Interestingly, most of the plants visited by bumble bees in this study were native plants, such as T. repens , R. fruticosus , or L. corniculatus (Table SII).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify plant sources of pollen loads obtained from bumblebees and to analyze the degree of floral specialization of different species, we prepared permanent glycerine-gelatin microscope slides for overall 39 pollen loads following the protocol as described in Leonhardt and Blüthgen (2012).…”
Section: Palynological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%