2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.11.430723
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The same ultra-rapid parallel brain dynamics underpin the production and perception of speech

Abstract: The temporal dynamics by which linguistic information becomes available is one of the key properties to understand how language is organised in the brain. An unresolved debate between different brain language models is whether words, the building blocks of language, are activated in a sequential or parallel manner. In this study we approached this issue from a novel perspective by directly comparing the time course of word component activation in speech production versus perception. In an overt object naming t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(220 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in polarity between pictures and words are not unusual and have previously been found in oral language experiments (e.g., Fairs et al, 2021), which supports the idea that task-related variables regulate not the presence of the effect but how lexical variables, such as lexical frequency, modulate the pattern of ERP components (e.g., Fischer-Baum et al, 2014;Strijkers et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Differences in polarity between pictures and words are not unusual and have previously been found in oral language experiments (e.g., Fairs et al, 2021), which supports the idea that task-related variables regulate not the presence of the effect but how lexical variables, such as lexical frequency, modulate the pattern of ERP components (e.g., Fischer-Baum et al, 2014;Strijkers et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…High frequency words elicited greater positivity compared to low frequency words starting at the 140-210ms time window. Differences in polarity between pictures and words are not unusual and have previously been found in oral language experiments (Fairs et al, 2021). Perhaps more surprising were the differences on the latency of the frequency effect in the two tasks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Similarly to word frequency, highly frequent syllable pairs are produced faster than less frequent syllable pairs [28,29]. We aimed to directly replicate a lab-based experiment [30], by using the same stimuli and procedure in the internet study as in the lab study. Our main aim was to determine if we could detect a word frequency effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%