2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SAMI Galaxy Survey: mass–kinematics scaling relations

Abstract: We use data from the Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral-field spectroscopy (SAMI) Galaxy Survey to study the dynamical scaling relation between galaxy stellar mass M * and the general kinematic parameter S K = KV 2 rot + σ 2 that combines rotation velocity V rot and velocity dispersion σ. We show that the log M * −log S K relation: (1) is linear above limits set by properties of the samples and observations; (2) has slightly different slope when derived from stellar or gas kinematic measurements; (3) applies to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlations between these characteristic measures of size, mass, and velocity are typically considered separately for ellipticals and spirals, although this is starting to change with the advent of integral field unit surveys, which have encouraged the use of more sophisticated kinematic measures (de Zeeuw et al 2002;Cappellari et al 2006;Weiner et al 2006;Kassin et al 2007;Cortese et al 2014;Barat et al 2019;Aquino-Ortíz et al 2020). Still, considering E and S galaxies separately seems justified (see e.g., Ouellette et al 2017), not only because their velocity metrics and morphologies differ, but also because they occupy rather distinct regions in mass-velocity-size space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations between these characteristic measures of size, mass, and velocity are typically considered separately for ellipticals and spirals, although this is starting to change with the advent of integral field unit surveys, which have encouraged the use of more sophisticated kinematic measures (de Zeeuw et al 2002;Cappellari et al 2006;Weiner et al 2006;Kassin et al 2007;Cortese et al 2014;Barat et al 2019;Aquino-Ortíz et al 2020). Still, considering E and S galaxies separately seems justified (see e.g., Ouellette et al 2017), not only because their velocity metrics and morphologies differ, but also because they occupy rather distinct regions in mass-velocity-size space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) We show that galaxies of all types lie on a plane relating mass, angular momentum and stellar-light distribution (Cortese et al 2016), 2) and that there is a relation between stellar population age and intrinsic ellipticity (van de Sande et al 2018). 3) By measuring the S 0.5 parameter, we demonstrate that we bring together the gas and stellar kinematic measurements of galaxies with all morphologies onto a single dynamical scaling relation (Barat et al 2019). 4) With high-order stellar kinematic measurements, we determine that galaxies with similar λ Re -ε e values can show different h 3 − V /σ signatures, which can be linked to their assembly history by comparing to zoom-in simulations (van de Sande et al 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The S 0.5 parameter, derived from the velocity and velocity dispersion such that S K = KV 2 rot + σ 2 , is a useful quantity that can unify the stellar and gas kinematic measurements of galaxies with all morphological types onto a single dynamical scaling relation (Weiner et al 2006;Kassin et al 2007;Cortese et al 2014). The log(M /M ) − log S 0.5 relation is explored in detail in Barat et al (2019) who use the SAMI Galaxy Survey to probe this relation down to low-stellar masses (log(M /M ) < 9; see Fig. 2).…”
Section: The Build-up Of Mass and Angular Momentum In Galaxies Acrossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations