Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose: While laparoscopic simulation-based training is a well-established component of general surgery training, no such requirement or standardized curriculum exists for robotic surgery. Furthermore, there is a lack of high-delity electrocautery simulation training exercises in the literature. Using Messick's validity framework, we sought to determine the content, response process, internal content and construct validity of a novel inanimate tissue model that utilizes electrocautery for potential incorporation in such curricula.Methods: Multi-institutional, prospective study involving medical students (MS) and general surgery residents (PGY1-3). Participants performed an exercise using a biotissue bowel model on the da Vinci Xi robotic console during which they created an enterotomy using electrocautery followed by approximation with interrupted sutures. Participant performance was recorded and then scored by crowd-sourced assessors of technical skill along with three of the authors. Construct validity was determined via difference in Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) score, time to completion and total number of errors between the two cohorts. Upon completion of the exercise, participants were surveyed on their perception of the exercise and its impact on their robotic training to determine content validity.Results: 31 participants were enrolled and separated into two cohorts: MS + PGY1 vs PGY2-3. Time spent on the robotic trainer (0.8 vs 8.13 hours, p=0.002), number of bedside robotic assists (5.7 vs 14.8, p<0.001), and number of robotic cases as primary surgeon (0.3 vs 13.1, p<0.001) were statistically signi cant between the two groups. Differences in GEARS scores (18.5 vs 19.9, p=0.001), time to completion (26.1 vs 14.4 min, p<0.001), and total errors (21.5 vs 11.9, p=0.018) between the groups were statistically signi cant as well. Of the 23 participants that completed the post-exercise survey, 87% and 91.3% reported improvement in robotic surgical ability and con dence, respectively. On a 10-point Likert scale, respondents rated the realism of the exercise 7.5, educational bene t 9.1, and effectiveness in teaching robotic skills 8.7. Controlling for the upfront investment of certain training materials, each exercise iteration cost ~$30.Conclusions: This study con rmed the content, response process, internal structure and construct validity of a novel, high-delity and cost-effective inanimate tissue exercise which successfully incorporates electrocautery. Consideration should be given to its addition to robotic surgery training programs.
Purpose: While laparoscopic simulation-based training is a well-established component of general surgery training, no such requirement or standardized curriculum exists for robotic surgery. Furthermore, there is a lack of high-delity electrocautery simulation training exercises in the literature. Using Messick's validity framework, we sought to determine the content, response process, internal content and construct validity of a novel inanimate tissue model that utilizes electrocautery for potential incorporation in such curricula.Methods: Multi-institutional, prospective study involving medical students (MS) and general surgery residents (PGY1-3). Participants performed an exercise using a biotissue bowel model on the da Vinci Xi robotic console during which they created an enterotomy using electrocautery followed by approximation with interrupted sutures. Participant performance was recorded and then scored by crowd-sourced assessors of technical skill along with three of the authors. Construct validity was determined via difference in Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) score, time to completion and total number of errors between the two cohorts. Upon completion of the exercise, participants were surveyed on their perception of the exercise and its impact on their robotic training to determine content validity.Results: 31 participants were enrolled and separated into two cohorts: MS + PGY1 vs PGY2-3. Time spent on the robotic trainer (0.8 vs 8.13 hours, p=0.002), number of bedside robotic assists (5.7 vs 14.8, p<0.001), and number of robotic cases as primary surgeon (0.3 vs 13.1, p<0.001) were statistically signi cant between the two groups. Differences in GEARS scores (18.5 vs 19.9, p=0.001), time to completion (26.1 vs 14.4 min, p<0.001), and total errors (21.5 vs 11.9, p=0.018) between the groups were statistically signi cant as well. Of the 23 participants that completed the post-exercise survey, 87% and 91.3% reported improvement in robotic surgical ability and con dence, respectively. On a 10-point Likert scale, respondents rated the realism of the exercise 7.5, educational bene t 9.1, and effectiveness in teaching robotic skills 8.7. Controlling for the upfront investment of certain training materials, each exercise iteration cost ~$30.Conclusions: This study con rmed the content, response process, internal structure and construct validity of a novel, high-delity and cost-effective inanimate tissue exercise which successfully incorporates electrocautery. Consideration should be given to its addition to robotic surgery training programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.