2011
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200911414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The saturation of galactic dynamos

Abstract: We summarize the current state of the long term discussion about the saturation mechanisms associated with rapid growth of small-scale magnetic field, that operate in large-scale galactic dynamos, and related problems with magnetic helicity conservation. Our general conclusion is that, taking into account magnetic helicity fluxes, large-scale magnetic field can be amplified up to about the equipartition level. In contrast, models without helicity fluxes give an initial temporal magnetic field growth, but then … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also true that the saturation fields in our model are rather small compared to the equipartition field strength. This was also observed in the model of Shukurov et al (2006); see also Moss & Sokoloff (2011). One possibility, that we have not explored, is that the neglected inhomogeneity of the solar convection zone may be important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also true that the saturation fields in our model are rather small compared to the equipartition field strength. This was also observed in the model of Shukurov et al (2006); see also Moss & Sokoloff (2011). One possibility, that we have not explored, is that the neglected inhomogeneity of the solar convection zone may be important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It has been suggested that the quenching may be alleviated by the expulsion of magnetic helicity through open boundaries (Blackman & Field, 2000;Kleeorin et al, 2000). At least three different physical mechanisms may help in the expulsion of small scale magnetic helicity: (a) large scale shear (Vishniac & Cho, 2001;Subramanian & Brandenburg, 2004;Brandenburg & Sandin, 2004;Moss & Sokoloff, 2011); (b) turbulent diffusion of magnetic helicity (Mitra et al, 2010a); (c) non-zero mean flow out from a boundary of the domain, e.g. a wind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regular field strength increases faster for higher dynamo numbers in the exponentially growing phase of a large-scale dynamo. The final field strength also depends on the dynamo saturation, which is a matter of heavy debate (e.g., Moss & Sokoloff 2011). The disk height and turbulent velocity are not independent.…”
Section: Integrated Galaxy Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the basic starting point, we assumed that this layer is not too thin, otherwise a magnetic field could not be generated (Phillips 2001;Arshakian et al 2009;Moss & Sokoloff 2011). Also, the observed half thickness of the layer of partially ionized warm HI in the solar vicinity is about 400 pc (Cox 2005).…”
Section: The Parameter Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the uncertainties in the data into account, we consider two simple models with very different, however feasible, parameters for the layer of partially ionized gas (WIM+HI). As the basic starting point, we assumed that this layer is not too thin, otherwise a magnetic field could not be generated (Phillips 2001;Arshakian et al 2009;Moss & Sokoloff 2011). Also, the observed half thickness of the layer of partially ionized warm HI in the solar vicinity is about 400 pc (Cox 2005).…”
Section: The Parameter Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%