1999
DOI: 10.2753/pet1061-1991410973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Savings of the Population and Domestic Sources of Economic Growth in Russia: Results of Experimental Studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 One limitation of these studies is that even when proper panel data sets were used, the panel dimension of the data was 1 As documented in Mikhalev (1996), before the transition 'people had virtually no social risks while the state took care of their education, job placement, health and child care, accommodation, and provision for old age and disability ' (p. 6). 2 According to Rimashevskaia (1999), 18.9% of the households interviewed in 1996 in a study conducted by the Institute for Social-Economic Problems of the Population declared that they saved in expectation of unanticipated events like loss of work or illness. 3 For instance, using US data, Carroll & Samwick (1997 found strong evidence in favour of the precautionary saving hypothesis, while Dynan (1993) found virtually no evidence of precautionary saving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 One limitation of these studies is that even when proper panel data sets were used, the panel dimension of the data was 1 As documented in Mikhalev (1996), before the transition 'people had virtually no social risks while the state took care of their education, job placement, health and child care, accommodation, and provision for old age and disability ' (p. 6). 2 According to Rimashevskaia (1999), 18.9% of the households interviewed in 1996 in a study conducted by the Institute for Social-Economic Problems of the Population declared that they saved in expectation of unanticipated events like loss of work or illness. 3 For instance, using US data, Carroll & Samwick (1997 found strong evidence in favour of the precautionary saving hypothesis, while Dynan (1993) found virtually no evidence of precautionary saving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… According to Rimashevskaia (1999), 18.9% of the households interviewed in 1996 in a study conducted by the Institute for Social‐Economic Problems of the Population declared that they saved in expectation of unanticipated events like loss of work or illness. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dynan (1993) found no evidence for precautionary saving, whereas Guiso et al (1992) and Lusardi (1997, 1998) only found little evidence, and Kazarosian (1997) along with the studies relative to the UK found strong evidence. Few studies have tested the precautionary saving hypothesis in the context of transition economies (see Rimashevskaia, 1999; and Guariglia and Kim, 2003a, 2003b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… One million roubles correspond approximately to 180 US dollars on the basis of the exchange rate prevailing in October 1996. The main objective of the survey analysed by Rimashevskaia (1999) was to obtain suitable information about the overall amount and patterns of saving of the population. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%