2015
DOI: 10.1080/15402002.2015.1046356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SBSM Guide to Actigraphy Monitoring: Clinical and Research Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
285
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
285
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[15; 23; 24] It is widely used in sleep and chronobiology research, particularly for its non-invasive presence in the subject’s own environment. [20] Actigraphy time series were analyzed using dedicated software provided by the manufacturer (Action W, Version 2.7 and Action 4, Version 1.16; Ambulatory Monitoring Inc., USA). These programs provided validated parameters for objectively assessing sleep and circadian function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15; 23; 24] It is widely used in sleep and chronobiology research, particularly for its non-invasive presence in the subject’s own environment. [20] Actigraphy time series were analyzed using dedicated software provided by the manufacturer (Action W, Version 2.7 and Action 4, Version 1.16; Ambulatory Monitoring Inc., USA). These programs provided validated parameters for objectively assessing sleep and circadian function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] The rest-activity rhythm, which can be evaluated with an actigraph, is often a preferred biomarker of the circadian timing system compared to evaluation of serum or salivary cortisol because of its non-invasiveness, relative cost, continuity of monitoring throughout day and night, and practical considerations for patients with high disease burden. Analysis of actigraphy recordings provides relevant and robust parameters, such as the dichotomy index I<O, which represents relative differences in activity between time spent in bed versus out of bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the difference in time in bed and time of out of bed was >30 min between reported in the sleep log and the actigraph, the sleep graphs generated from the ActiLife software was visually inspected for an activity spikes. Time in bed typically is reflected by a sharp decrease in the activity spikes, and time out bed is typically reflected by an immediate increase of the activity spikes in the software 31 . After visually inspecting the activity spikes and comparing the data between the sleep log and the ActiLife software, two trained research personnel determined whether to manually enter the sleep periods from the sleep log or to maintain the sleep periods based on the software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All men provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at each site. For consistency with prior work (Paudel, Taylor et al, 2011) and because 72 hours of recording is considered the minimum period for assessing sleep-wake patterns with actigraph (Littner, Kushida et al, 2003; Ancoli-Israel, Martin et al, 2015), participants were required to have ≥3, 24-hour periods of technically adequate actigraph data (excluded n=134); therefore, the cross-sectional LCA was conducted with 3001 men (mean age=76.35, SD=5.52). To be included in the longitudinal analysis, participants were required to have complete outcome data from baseline and at least one other time-point; 68 of the men failed to meet this criteria and were excluded from the longitudinal analysis (which included n=2933 men).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%