2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8659.00656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scale Method for Blending Operations in Functionally‐Based Constructive Geometry

Abstract: This paper presents a scale method for developing high dimensional scale functions to blend implicitly defined objects. Scale functions are differentiable on the entire domain except the origin, provide blending range control, and behave like Min/Max operators everywhere, so even a successive composition of blending operations containing overlapped blending regions can be generated smoothly. Because the scale method is a generalized method, implicit or parametric curves, such as cubic Bezier curves, rational c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently Barthe et al 30 and Hsu et al 17 introduced new CSG opertors with smooth transitions. In Hsu et al, operators can be n-ary and a lot of flexibility is provided in the choice of the function defining the operator.…”
Section: /mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently Barthe et al 30 and Hsu et al 17 introduced new CSG opertors with smooth transitions. In Hsu et al, operators can be n-ary and a lot of flexibility is provided in the choice of the function defining the operator.…”
Section: /mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unbounded representation provides a general implicit volume representation 13 and therefore, a wide variety of modelling operators such as sweeping by moving solids 14 , Boolean composition with soft transition 9 > 15 > 16 > 17 and Constructive Volume Geometry algebra 18 , have been proposed. Due to their global definition, it is difficult to provide both accurate and interactive surface rendering 30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the blends in 19 , 20 offered blending range parametersto adjust the blending region for soft object modeling.For example, the scale method 20 gave a scale union B SA ( x 1 , x 2 ) with a curvature parameter p and blending rangeparameters r 1 and r 2 . Adjusting r 1 and r 2 can limit theblending surface B SA ( f 1 , f 2 ) = 0.5 in the blending region { X ∈ R 3 | 0.5(1 − r 1 ) ≤ f 1 ( X ) ≤ 0.5 and 0.5(1 − r 2 ) ≤ f 2 ( X ) ≤ 0.5},and f 1 = 0.5 and f 2 = 0.5 are deformed locally.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the sizes of theseblending surfaces above depend completely on the sizes ofblended primitives. Even though blending operators in 19 , 20 can change the blending region by adjusting the blendingrange parameters, they are computationally more expensiveand their blending surfaces still can not exceed the sizes ofblended primitives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, many defining functions were developed, including generalized distance functions [5], super-quadrics [6], generalized distance metrics [7], super-ellipsoids [8]- [10], cylinders [11], sweep objects [12] and hyper-quadrics [13]. Among these functions above, super-quadrics [2] can be represented parametrically, too, and briefly they have both the advantages of implicit and parametric surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%