2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The scattering phase function of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko coma as seen from the Rosetta/OSIRIS instrument

Abstract: The study of dust, the most abundant material in cometary nuclei, is pivotal in understanding the original materials forming the Solar system. Measuring the coma phase function provides a tool to investigate the nature of cometary dust. Rosetta/OSIRIS sampled the coma phase function of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, covering a large phase angle range in a small amount of time. Twelve series were acquired in the period from 2015 March to 2016 February for this scientific purpose. These data allowed, after str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should indeed be the case because larger particles should behave more and more like "small comets" themselves and thus be representative of the nucleus scattering properties. For small particles, the best agreement of a single dust size with the coma phases function [38] is between 10 and 100 µm. The numerical method of Markkanen et al [34] is not applicable to particles smaller than 1µm.…”
Section: Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should indeed be the case because larger particles should behave more and more like "small comets" themselves and thus be representative of the nucleus scattering properties. For small particles, the best agreement of a single dust size with the coma phases function [38] is between 10 and 100 µm. The numerical method of Markkanen et al [34] is not applicable to particles smaller than 1µm.…”
Section: Scattering Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w λ is the single-scattering albedo from Fornasier et al (2015), estimated from Hapke modeling (Hapke, 2012) of the surface scattering curve, p (g) is the particle phase function from Bertini et al (2017), and p(0) is the extrapolation of this phase function for phase g = 0. Assuming a differential grain size distribution n (r) , described by a power law ∝ r h+1 , and assuming spherical grains, the expression for the integrated dust mass is M = 2ρ · f · πR 2 n (r) r 2 dr n (r) rdr , Table 2); squares show the double type-C outbursts on 30 August 2015 at 12h21 (jets 17 and 18 in Table 2), and the large square corresponds to the brighter of the two jets (jet 18); and the diamond indicates a transient event on 30 August 2015 at 8h09 (jet 13 in Table 2) where R is the aperture radius in meters and r is the grain radius.…”
Section: Resolved Outburst In Bes From May 2016 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dust scattering is accounted for, it is modeled either by an isotropic phase function or by an anisotropic phase function that only includes forward scattering. Neither phase function is actually consistent with that of the dust coma of comet 67P/C-G, which features both moderate backward and forward scattering at optical and near-infrared wavelengths (Bertini et al 2017;Bockelée-Morvan et al 2019). Adopting this observed phase function to the MWC 758 disk model of Baruteau et al (2019) leads to a lower level of flux and an enhancement of the disk emission between the two asymmetric bright rings (Fig.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Left. Phase curves of two debris disks around HD35841 (measured in the H-band with the Gemini Planet Imager,Esposito et al 2018) and HD191089 (measured in the optical with HST/ STIS and in the J band with HST/NICMOS,Ren et al 2019), presenting quite fair an agreement with those of 67P/C-G extracted from OSIRIS on 28 August 2015, soon after perihelion passage(Bertini et al 2017). Right.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation