2005
DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2005.9515102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Schmidt hammer as a relative‐age dating technique: Potential and limitations of its application on Holocene moraines in Mt Cook National Park, Southern Alps, New Zealand

Abstract: The use of the Schmidt hammer for the relativeage dating of boulder and bedrock surfaces is outlined. Two examples of the application of the Schmidt hammer for the dating of Holocene moraines in Mt Cook National Park, Southern Alps, New Zealand, confirm the potential of this method. With this technique it is possible to differentiate between Holocene moraines of different age (especially those built up since c. 5000 yr BP). The results show partial differences to those obtained from other dating techniques in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This correlation is in accordance with abundant previous research focusing on the Schmidt hammer or weathering rinds developed on deglaciated terrains in millennial time-scales (Carroll 1974;Porter 1975;Chinn 1981;Matthew and Shakesby 1984;McCarroll 1989McCarroll , 1991Nesje 1993, 1996;Aa and Sjåstad 2000;Kotarba et al 2002;Winkler 2005;Shakesby et al 2006;Owen et al 2007;Nicholson 2009;Matthew and Owen 2011), as well as with rather limited studies performed within LIA forelands (Evant et al1999;Etienne 2002;Matthews and Owen 2008;Dąbski 2009Dąbski , 2012Dąbski , 2014Dąbski and Tittenbrun 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This correlation is in accordance with abundant previous research focusing on the Schmidt hammer or weathering rinds developed on deglaciated terrains in millennial time-scales (Carroll 1974;Porter 1975;Chinn 1981;Matthew and Shakesby 1984;McCarroll 1989McCarroll , 1991Nesje 1993, 1996;Aa and Sjåstad 2000;Kotarba et al 2002;Winkler 2005;Shakesby et al 2006;Owen et al 2007;Nicholson 2009;Matthew and Owen 2011), as well as with rather limited studies performed within LIA forelands (Evant et al1999;Etienne 2002;Matthews and Owen 2008;Dąbski 2009Dąbski , 2012Dąbski , 2014Dąbski and Tittenbrun 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The measurement of weathering-rind thickness on boulders [23,24] and lichenometry, both used for related relative-age dating [18,[25][26][27][28], have also been applied. Additionally, the potential of the Schmidt hammer as relative-age dating technique has clearly been demonstrated by its successful application on several lateral and latero-frontal moraine sequences in the Mt Cook/Aoraki National Park [19,29]. The relatively homogenous and weathering-resistant bedrock yielded comparatively small standard errors and, as a result, a relatively high time resolution in the order of 200-300 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a geochronological context, the Schmidt hammer is widely used as a relative-age dating technique on glacially eroded bedrock surfaces, boulders embedded in glacial deposits, rock glaciers and talus, e.g. [19,29,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. The measurement of surface hardness of rock surfaces reveals information on their exposure to subaerial weathering processes and, therefore, on the relative-age of related moraine formations.…”
Section: Schmidt Hammermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations