The Science of Training and Development in Organizations

Abstract

Organizations in the United States alone spend billions on training each year. These training and development activities allow organizations to adapt, compete, excel, innovate, produce, be safe, improve service, and reach goals. Training has successfully been used to reduce errors in such high-risk settings as emergency rooms, aviation, and the military. However, training is also important in more conventional organizations. These organizations understand that training helps them to remain competitive by continually educating their workforce. They understand that investing in their employees yields greater results. However, training is not as intuitive as it may seem. There is a science of training that shows that there is a right way and a wrong way to design, deliver, and implement a training program. The research on training clearly shows two things: (a) training works, and (b) the way training is designed, delivered, and implemented matters. This article aims to explain why training is important and how to use training appropriately. Using the training literature as a guide, we explain what training is, why it is important, and provide recommendations for implementing a training program in an organization. In particular, we argue that training is a systematic process, and we explain what matters before, during, and after training. Steps to take at each of these three time periods are listed and described and are summarized in a checklist for ease of use. We conclude with a discussion of implications for both leaders and policymakers and an exploration of issues that may come up when deciding to implement a training program. Furthermore, we include key questions that executives and policymakers should ask about the design, delivery, or implementation of a training program. Finally, we consider future research that is important in this area, including some still unanswered questions and room for development in this evolving field.

Distinctive Personality Traits of Information Technology Professionals

“…(2014) also lists coordinating the work of others and developing and building teams as key IT work activities. This facet of IT work is consistent with widespread reliance on work teams by private-sector and public organizations in the last two decades (Landy & Conte, 2013), and the rising prevalence of team training (Salas, Tannenbaum, Kraiger & Smith-Jentsch, 2012). Today's IT work includes not only the solitary work of programming, but a mix of interactive tasks calling for teamwork with peers, performed in an inter-group and inter-departmental context (Schneider, 2002).…”

Is The "grass" Greener? Occupational Wellness In The Colorado Cannabis Industry

“…I encourage the cannabis industry to follow evidence-based best practices to maximize training effectiveness, such as those described by Salas, Tannenbaum, Kraiger, and Smith-Jentsch (2012).…”

Evaluación de la eficacia de la formación en la Administración Pública: la transferencia al puesto

“…Además de los factores mencionados se han encontrado relaciones entre variables que no aparecen recogidas en el modelo de Pineda et al (2013), como son el factor generación de una comunidad o red de profesionales, referido al grado en que los participantes generan una red profesional para comentar, colaborar o compartir ideas relacionadas con la formación, la organización o su práctica profesional (e.g., Boud y Middleton, 2003;Ingvarson, Meiers y Beavis, 2005). La transferencia también aparece relacionada con la variable tiempo; por ejemplo, algunos estudios han destacado el impacto del momento en el que tiene lugar la formación (Broad, 2005;Salas, Tannenbaum, Kraiger y Smith-Jentsch, 2012) y han puesto de manifiesto que el uso de habilidades aprendidas en la formación declina con el paso del tiempo (e. g., Blume et al, 2010;Tziner y Falbe, 1993), pero no existe un índice formalizado que ilustre cómo el constructo cambia en función del paso del tiempo.…”