2012
DOI: 10.1007/bf03392286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The science of values: The Moral Landscape by Sam Harris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harris suggested that science can guide morality, provided that the well-being of conscious creatures is properly defined and established as the most fundamental concern of morality. For behavior analysts, defining such a term might involve examining it as a function of the conditions in which it is commonly used (Diller and Nuzzolilli 2012;Schlinger and Normand 2013;Skinner 1945). Just as physicists have relied on functional definitions to effectively explain the behavior of matter, behavior analysts tend to employ such definitions in explaining the behavior of organisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harris suggested that science can guide morality, provided that the well-being of conscious creatures is properly defined and established as the most fundamental concern of morality. For behavior analysts, defining such a term might involve examining it as a function of the conditions in which it is commonly used (Diller and Nuzzolilli 2012;Schlinger and Normand 2013;Skinner 1945). Just as physicists have relied on functional definitions to effectively explain the behavior of matter, behavior analysts tend to employ such definitions in explaining the behavior of organisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reviews of The Moral Landscape are more positive and have offered constructive recommendations to further Harris' science of morality. In their review, Diller and Nuzzolilli (2012) call upon behavior analysts to support and advance an empirical approach to morality by employing behavior change techniques to encourage prosocial (i.e., moral) behavior. Wall and Shackelford (2011) present a largely favorable review of Harris' argument but observe that, while Harris indeed argues for respecting the well-being of nonhuman creatures, he provides inadequate attention to issues of animal welfare (e.g., animal testing and the consumption of animals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall and Shackelford (2011) present a largely favorable review of Harris' argument but observe that, while Harris indeed argues for respecting the well-being of nonhuman creatures, he provides inadequate attention to issues of animal welfare (e.g., animal testing and the consumption of animals). Although a scientific system of morality is not currently attainable in practice, several academics are supportive of its pursuit (e.g., Diller and Nuzzolilli 2012;Wall and Shackelford 2011), including Richard Dawkins, Lawrence Krauss, and Steven Pinker, whose endorsements are printed on the book's dust jacket (Harris 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moral landscape is a concept that "addresses the interrelationship between landscapes and moral values and judgments" [ (7), 191], and is "a hypothetical space representing human well-being […] where the peaks of this landscape are the heights of prosperity, and the valleys represent human suffering" (8) [as cited in Diller and Nuzzolilli (9), 266]. This paper uses the term "moral landscape" in conjunction with paradox perspective on corporate sustainability framework of Hahn et al (10) to analyze the peaks and valleys of Canadian grocers and their stakeholders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%