2020
DOI: 10.31866/2709-846x.2.2020.222646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scientific and Philosophical Understanding of Socio-Cultural Essence of Management

Abstract: Introduction. Every science, with its abstract-logical method, in the process of formation inevitably reaches the limits of knowledge of its research subject. The means of expanding these boundaries is the philosophy of science. As for management, it is the philosophy of management as its Meta science. According to the author's article, the management philosophy, in addition to expanding the boundaries of knowledge, will cope with the eclectic danger that threatens management today as a science. However, the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They develop a socio-ethical approach, according to which the owners and managers of the organization are responsible for the balanced observance of the common interests of the organization, the interests of stakeholders, and global public interests. This approach is also been developed by Ukrainian scientists (Abolina, 2012;Hrishnova, 2010;Kolot et al, 2010;Kovalenko, 2020aKovalenko, , 2020bKovalenko, , 2021Kovalenko et al, 2019;Martynyshyn & Khlystun, 2018, 2019Martynyshyn & Kovalenko, 2016, 2017, 2018a, 2018bMartynyshyn et al, 2020aMartynyshyn et al, , 2020bPalekha, 2009;Radchenko, 2014;Savchenko & Radchenko 2008), who argue that organizations should make voluntary commitments to society and direct part of their funds to improve it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They develop a socio-ethical approach, according to which the owners and managers of the organization are responsible for the balanced observance of the common interests of the organization, the interests of stakeholders, and global public interests. This approach is also been developed by Ukrainian scientists (Abolina, 2012;Hrishnova, 2010;Kolot et al, 2010;Kovalenko, 2020aKovalenko, , 2020bKovalenko, , 2021Kovalenko et al, 2019;Martynyshyn & Khlystun, 2018, 2019Martynyshyn & Kovalenko, 2016, 2017, 2018a, 2018bMartynyshyn et al, 2020aMartynyshyn et al, , 2020bPalekha, 2009;Radchenko, 2014;Savchenko & Radchenko 2008), who argue that organizations should make voluntary commitments to society and direct part of their funds to improve it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, scientists are further developing these areas of management, adjusting and supplementing them with cultural components, in accordance with new organizational realities (Drucker, 2008;Florida, 2019;Hamel, 2007;Kovalenko, 2018Kovalenko, , 2020aKovalenko, , 2020bKovalenko, , 2021aKovalenko, , 2021bMartynyshyn & Khlystun, 2018, 2019Martynyshyn & Kovalenko, 2016, 2017a, 2017b, 2018a, 2018b, 2018cMartynyshyn et al, 2020aMartynyshyn et al, , 2020bMintzberg, 2011;Pink, 2015;Senge et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same regard, it is also necessary to note the research of Yaroslav Martynyshyn, Olena Khlystun, Yelena Kovalenko (Kovalenko, 2017(Kovalenko, , 2018(Kovalenko, , 2020a(Kovalenko, , 2020b(Kovalenko, , 2021a(Kovalenko, , 2021b(Kovalenko, , 2022Martynyshyn & Khlystun, 2018Martynyshyn & Kovalenko, 2016, 2018a, 2018bMartynyshyn et al, 2020aMartynyshyn et al, , 2020bMartynyshyn et al, , 2022, which relate to socio-cultural aspects of management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%