1960
DOI: 10.1080/00963402.1960.11454043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scientist in Politics: On Top or on Tap?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion of the role of scientists, or 'whether scientists should be on top or on tap' in political deci sionmaking, has also been a major feature of the Bulletin through the decades of its publication; see, for example,Simpson (1960).24 In BernardBrodie's (1947) assessment at the time, it would take the Soviet Union 8-15 years to develop the bomb. However, the Soviet Union carried out its first test explosion already in 1949, which was reflected in the first reset of the Bulletin Clock and most of the contents of the October 1949 issue of the Bulletin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion of the role of scientists, or 'whether scientists should be on top or on tap' in political deci sionmaking, has also been a major feature of the Bulletin through the decades of its publication; see, for example,Simpson (1960).24 In BernardBrodie's (1947) assessment at the time, it would take the Soviet Union 8-15 years to develop the bomb. However, the Soviet Union carried out its first test explosion already in 1949, which was reflected in the first reset of the Bulletin Clock and most of the contents of the October 1949 issue of the Bulletin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%