2019
DOI: 10.1177/1559325819852810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scoliosis Quandary: Are Radiation Exposures From Repeated X-Rays Harmful?

Abstract: X-rays have been the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of spinal scoliosis for decades as other assessment methods are indirect, too expensive, or not practical in practice. The average scoliosis patient will receive 10 to 25 spinal X-rays over several years equating to a maximum estimated dose of 10 to 25 mGy. Some patients, those getting diagnosed at a younger age and receiving early and ongoing treatments, may receive up to 40 to 50 X-rays, approaching at most 50 mGy. There are concern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns over radiation exposures during routine spinal X-ray imaging need discussion. Although this topic has been thoroughly discussed elsewhere [57][58][59][60], in brief, patient exposures from spinal X-rays are not harmful. First, the assumption that radiation exposures from low-doses are carcinogenic is false; low-doses of radiation (including X-rays and CT scans) stimulate the adaptive protection systems in the body to "over-repair" any genetic damage done, including DNA double strand breaks by imaging [61].…”
Section: Contraindications To Extension Tractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerns over radiation exposures during routine spinal X-ray imaging need discussion. Although this topic has been thoroughly discussed elsewhere [57][58][59][60], in brief, patient exposures from spinal X-rays are not harmful. First, the assumption that radiation exposures from low-doses are carcinogenic is false; low-doses of radiation (including X-rays and CT scans) stimulate the adaptive protection systems in the body to "over-repair" any genetic damage done, including DNA double strand breaks by imaging [61].…”
Section: Contraindications To Extension Tractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the assumption that radiation exposures from low-doses are carcinogenic is false; low-doses of radiation (including X-rays and CT scans) stimulate the adaptive protection systems in the body to "over-repair" any genetic damage done, including DNA double strand breaks by imaging [61]. Second, because of point one, there is no cumulative effect; therefore, the only relative risk can be considered from a single session of X-rays (i.e., 1-3 mGy) [57,58]. Third, due to point two, the amount of radiation from X-rays of 1-3 mGy is many times lower than the recognized dose threshold for leukemia of 1100 mGy (95% CI: 500-2600 mGy) [57,62] and therefore cannot be carcinogenic.…”
Section: Contraindications To Extension Tractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, as Oakley et al have pointed out, scoliosis patients at most must be evaluated for harmful exposure from the total dose received from a single X-ray examination procedure, or about 1-3 mGy. 109 This makes the above aforementioned 0.25% increase above a 40% background cancer incidence all the more irrelevant (i.e. 0.005-0.015% added to background).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the multiple X-ray exposures during control visits would be too burdensome for the children. 17,18 On the other hand, the newest systems using e.g. convolutional neural networks were developed and proposed for clinical assessment.…”
Section: Spinalmeter Methods For the Determination Of Postural Status mentioning
confidence: 99%