2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-021-05701-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sea level variability and its projections over the Indo‐Pacific Ocean in CMIP5 models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AICC current regime of the SIO and the west coast of Australia also show a considerable increase in the sea level variability. The thermocline ridge region, however, shows a marked decrease in variability which is in agreement with the CMIP5 models (Deepa et al, 2021). Notably, the thermocline ridge region is shown to be one of the internal variabilities dominated regions (Han et al, 2014).…”
Section: Projectionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The AICC current regime of the SIO and the west coast of Australia also show a considerable increase in the sea level variability. The thermocline ridge region, however, shows a marked decrease in variability which is in agreement with the CMIP5 models (Deepa et al, 2021). Notably, the thermocline ridge region is shown to be one of the internal variabilities dominated regions (Han et al, 2014).…”
Section: Projectionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The western Arabian sea shows the strongest increase in the sea level variability with an increase of ~30% compared to the historical period under the high emission scenario. This is a significant increase over the CMIP5 model estimates on the projected variability of this region (see Figure 8e of Deepa et al, 2021). The AICC current regime of the SIO and the west coast of Australia also show a considerable increase in the sea level variability.…”
Section: Projectionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we are motivated here by long‐term regional sea‐level changes, the role of Madden‐Julian Oscillation on an intraseasonal timescale (Oliver & Thompson, 2010; Vialard et al., 2009; X. Zhang et al., 2009), monsoon on seasonal and semi‐annual timescales (e.g., McCreary et al., 1996; Qu et al., 2022), IOD and El Niño Southern Oscillation on an interannual timescale (e.g., Hameed et al., 2018; McPhaden et al., 2006), and Pacific Decadal Oscillation on a decadal timescale (Deepa et al., 2021; Nidheesh et al., 2019; Piecuch et al., 2019) and even remote oceanic Rossby and Kelvin wave forcing (e.g., Cheng et al., 2016) may be important for sea‐level attribution and demand further investigation. Although we argue the positive IOD‐like change in the tropical Indian Ocean in the climate change time scale (shown as the difference between two 30 years period), the impact of different natural and anthropogenic forcings on IOD characteristics on the interannual scale is beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Philippine Sea (PS) in the northwestern tropical Pacific Ocean is one of the regions with the strongest variability in sea level and upper‐layer circulation (Han et al., 2013, 2017; D. Hu et al., 2015; Qiu & Chen, 2012; Qiu et al., 2021), particularly on interannual timescales linked to the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO). During the developing stage of El Niño events, the PS shows sea level falling in response to westerly wind bursts over the western Pacific, with the opposite changes occurring in La Niña condition (Chang et al., 2013; Deepa et al., 2021; Han et al., 2019; Li et al., 2012; Q. Ren, Li, Zheng, et al., 2020; Zhai & Hu, 2012). Super El Niño events such as the 1982/1983 and 1997/1998 ones gave rise to sea level falling near the western tropical Pacific islands by up to 20–30 cm, dramatically increasing the explosion risks of shallow coral reefs and damaging local ecosystems (e.g., Widlansky et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%