The Search for Common Factors in Psychotherapy: Two Theoretical Models with Different Empirical Implications

Abstract

Abstract:The difficulties of demonstrating that any specific form of psychotherapy is more effective than any other has led to the formulation of the so-called Dodo Bird Verdict (that all forms of therapy are equally effective) and to the suggestion that what really matters for therapeutic efficiency are factors that are common to different forms of therapy. The term "common factors", however, is seldom defined in an unambiguous way. In this paper, two different models of "common factors" are differentiated, and their implications are compared. The first model is referred to as the Relational-Procedural Persuasion (RPP) model and is primarily based on the writings of Frank and Wampold; according to this model effective psychotherapy requires a good therapeutic relationship, a specified therapeutic procedure, and a rhetorically skilful psychotherapist who persuades the client of a new explanation that provides new perspectives and meanings in life. The contents of these procedures and perspectives, however, are less important -according to this model, the treatment procedures are beneficial to the client because of the meaning attributed to these procedures rather than because of the specific nature of the procedures. The other model, the Methodological Principles and Skills (MPS) model, is based on the assumption that effective psychotherapy relies on common methodological principles that are instantiated in various ways in different forms of psychotherapy, and on the therapist's capacity of applying these principles in a skillful way. According to this model, method matters, and it is possible to improve existing methods. Whereas the MPS model carries a hope for the improvement of psychotherapy, the RPP model implies a more pessimistic view of psychotherapy as forever bound by the limits of the Dodo Bird Verdict. It is concluded that psychotherapy research may benefit from using the MPS model as a working hypothesis, but that a comprehensive model of common factors in psychotherapy also needs to integrate important insights from the RPP model, as well as an understanding of the structural characteristics that psychotherapy shares with other kinds of social interaction.

Research on psychotherapy integration: Building on the past, looking to the future

“…Interestingly, Lundh (2014) has recently offered a conceptual model that could guide future research on common factors, while recognizing the complexity of therapeutic change. Rooted in the original work of Goldfried (1980), this model assumes that common methodological principles exist, that these principles can operate via diverse techniques, and that these principles and techniques can be combined with various levels of skills.…”

Psychotherapy and youth suicide prevention: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of specialist clinicians' experiences

“…Successfully navigating the dynamics and tensions in treatments that support young people's ongoing development called for a therapeutic stance that balanced sensitivity and assertiveness (Arain et al, 2013). A strong therapeutic alliance, a common factor across helpful psychotherapeutic interventions (Lundh, 2014; Wampold, 2015; Wampold et al, 1997), was required to navigate the inherent therapeutic tensions. Wraparound support from trusted adults (e.g., families, schools) resounds throughout current research (Asarnow & Mehlum, 2019; Brent, 2016; Caine, Reed, Hindman, & Quinlan, 2018; Iyengar et al, 2018; Wilcox & Wyman, 2016; Zalsman et al, 2016).…”

The neglect of treatment-construct validity in psychotherapy research: a systematic review of comparative RCTs of psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder

“…The development of better measures, however, probably also requires an improved theoretical conceptualization of the methodological principles and therapeutic skills that may be hypothesized to be important for outcome. Here it may be argued (e.g., [ 23 , 42 , 43 , 54 , 62 ]) that psychotherapy research would benefit by a shift of focus from treatment packages to a systematic specification of basic methodological principles and therapeutic skills. Ideally, this would require a comprehensive, integrative theoretical conceptualization of psychotherapy, in terms of which both common factors and more specific factors can be delineated and operationalized.…”