1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0044798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The second facet of forgetting: A review of warm-up decrement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific (Adams, 1961) and general (Nacson & Schmidt, 1971;Schmidt & Nacson, 1971) accounts for warm-up decrement challenge the traditional memory based processes of performance reduction at the beginning of a practice session through forgetting (Anderson et al, 1999;A. Newell & Rosenbloom, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The specific (Adams, 1961) and general (Nacson & Schmidt, 1971;Schmidt & Nacson, 1971) accounts for warm-up decrement challenge the traditional memory based processes of performance reduction at the beginning of a practice session through forgetting (Anderson et al, 1999;A. Newell & Rosenbloom, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One of the more robust transient phenomenon in motor skills and the one investigated in this report is the influence of warm-up decrement (Adams, 1952(Adams, , 1961, which was modeled as an adaptation process with the fast time scale to examine the effect of practice and task difficulty. The results support the original account of warm-up decrement by Adams (1952) whereby the level of performance decrement was highest on day 1 and systematically decreased on trial 1 of the second and third days of practice ( Figure 3B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The literature on the role of set in learning and memory (Adams, 1961;Irion, 1948;McLaughlin, 1965;Postman, 1964) has not been concerned with whether or not set variables affect learning or retrieval apart from original learning. This study explored the latter possibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%