2019
DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2019.1572286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Second-Generation Liberation Movement in Southern Sudan: Anti-Colonialism as a Set of Practices

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The early debate on colonialism and Kurdistan ranges from the assertion that "Kurdistan is not even a colony" referring to the absence of an official status of colony, to the argument that it is an "international colony" (Beşikçi, 1991). Similar observations persist such as in the conceptualisation of second-generation liberation movements (e.g., Voller, 2022). Typically, the location of this debate is within the framework of "internal colonialism" (e.g., Kurt, 2019), which nonetheless paradoxically reinforces the colonial borders of those states by analytically construing the Kurdish question as the internal matter of singular states.…”
Section: Colonialism and Kurdistanmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The early debate on colonialism and Kurdistan ranges from the assertion that "Kurdistan is not even a colony" referring to the absence of an official status of colony, to the argument that it is an "international colony" (Beşikçi, 1991). Similar observations persist such as in the conceptualisation of second-generation liberation movements (e.g., Voller, 2022). Typically, the location of this debate is within the framework of "internal colonialism" (e.g., Kurt, 2019), which nonetheless paradoxically reinforces the colonial borders of those states by analytically construing the Kurdish question as the internal matter of singular states.…”
Section: Colonialism and Kurdistanmentioning
confidence: 73%