2022
DOI: 10.1075/sibil.63.05ayo
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The second language acquisition of grammatical gender and number in Italian

Abstract: This cross-sectional empirical study tested the ability of Anglophone L2 learners of Italian (n = 87) to assign grammatical gender and number to a subset of isolated nouns drawn from a written corpus of current magazine and newspaper articles. Italian native speakers served as controls (n = 109). We first present a descriptive account of grammatical gender that outlines several idiosyncrasies and complexities than may lead to difficulties for L2 learners, particularly English … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were more confident on the GJT (0.6%-6.3% of 'don't know' responses) than on the PGJT (11.7%-17.3% for the non-preferred sentence grammaticality and up to 27.3% for affective constructions). L1 speakers' confidence is generally high with ceiling performance on various tasks as with Italian L1 speakers whose accuracy on a written grammatical gender assignment task ranged from 90.0% to 99.7% along with negligible 'don't know' percentages (0%-0.1%) (Ayoun and Maranzana, 2022). L1 speakers are also typically able to correctly accept grammatical stimuli while correctly rejecting ungrammatical stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They were more confident on the GJT (0.6%-6.3% of 'don't know' responses) than on the PGJT (11.7%-17.3% for the non-preferred sentence grammaticality and up to 27.3% for affective constructions). L1 speakers' confidence is generally high with ceiling performance on various tasks as with Italian L1 speakers whose accuracy on a written grammatical gender assignment task ranged from 90.0% to 99.7% along with negligible 'don't know' percentages (0%-0.1%) (Ayoun and Maranzana, 2022). L1 speakers are also typically able to correctly accept grammatical stimuli while correctly rejecting ungrammatical stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It follows that, even though Russian and Greek employ agreement computations in the case of the Adj-N dependency, this does not guarantee its morphological realization in the way it is expressed in Greek. A plausible explanation comes from the fact that the features that manifest agreement are not always detectable in Greek, since the features of gender, number and case are extensively conflated, thus not meeting the requirement of a formal contrast that would render the features salient 15 (Lardiere 2009; see also Ayoun and Maranzana 2022). At the same time, the non-transparent nature of the morphological marking of gender in Russian could further reduce the attention of Russian learners on the respective markers that establish agreement in Greek (see Hopp and Lemmerth 2018 for similar effects on predictive reading).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%