2016
DOI: 10.13182/nse16-31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology for Nonlinear Systems—II: Illustrative Application to a Nonlinear Heat Conduction Problem

Abstract: This work presents an illustrative application of the second-order adjoint sensitivity analysis methodology (2 nd -ASAM) to a paradigm nonlinear heat conduction benchmark, which models a conceptual experimental test section containing heated rods immersed in liquid lead-bismuth eutectic. This benchmark admits an exact solution, thereby making transparent the underlying mathematical derivations. The general theory underlying 2 nd -ASAM indicates that, for a physical system comprising N  parameters, the computa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the 2nd-ASAM simultaneously intrinsically verifies the computations of the mixed second-order partial sensitivities by computing them twice, while using independently derived adjoint functions. The application of the 2nd-ASAM has been illustrated by means analytically solvable linear [13][14][15] and nonlinear [16] benchmark problems, which highlighted the fundamental importance of the 2nd-order sensitivities for causing asymmetries in the response distribution, and causing the "expected value of the response" to differ from the "computed nominal value of the response". Cacuci and Favorite highlighted the efficiency and accuracy of the 2nd-ASAM [17], who analyzed a multi-region radiation transport benchmark problem in two-dimensional cylindrical geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the 2nd-ASAM simultaneously intrinsically verifies the computations of the mixed second-order partial sensitivities by computing them twice, while using independently derived adjoint functions. The application of the 2nd-ASAM has been illustrated by means analytically solvable linear [13][14][15] and nonlinear [16] benchmark problems, which highlighted the fundamental importance of the 2nd-order sensitivities for causing asymmetries in the response distribution, and causing the "expected value of the response" to differ from the "computed nominal value of the response". Cacuci and Favorite highlighted the efficiency and accuracy of the 2nd-ASAM [17], who analyzed a multi-region radiation transport benchmark problem in two-dimensional cylindrical geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been shown in [15][16][17][18], the 2nd-order response sensitivities have the following major impacts on the computed moments of the response distribution: (a) they cause the "expected value of the response" to differ from the "computed nominal value of the response"; and (b) they contribute decisively to causing asymmetries in the response distribution. Indeed, neglecting the second-order sensitivities would nullify the third-order response correlations, and hence would nullify the skewness of the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All in all, the application of the PM_CMPS methodology has produced and improved, calibrated and validated model for simulating the functioning of a buoyancy-operated cooling tower under unsaturated conditions. Ongoing work aims at using second-order sensitivities, to be computed by applying the 2nd-ASAM presented in [13,14]. The availability of second-order response sensitivities will enable the computation of non-Gaussian features, such as skewness and kurtosis, of the response distributions of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…w , the air temperatures T (i) a and the air mass flow rate m a are computed by solving Equations (2)- (14), while the air relative humidity value, RH (i) , is obtained through the following expression:…”
Section: (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%