1951
DOI: 10.2514/8.1925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Secondary Flow in a Cascade of Airfoils in a Nonuniform Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1953
1953
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Designs with low Amplification Factor (AF Marsh ) have relatively low SKE and therefore exhibit only weak sensitivity to inlet conditions. • The variations in SKE can be captured using a simple model based on the inviscid vorticity calculation of Marsh (1976) and the streamfunction approach of Squire and Winter (1951). A similar approach could be used to perform sensitivity assessments in the preliminary stage of design, and could be readily extended to engine-realistic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Designs with low Amplification Factor (AF Marsh ) have relatively low SKE and therefore exhibit only weak sensitivity to inlet conditions. • The variations in SKE can be captured using a simple model based on the inviscid vorticity calculation of Marsh (1976) and the streamfunction approach of Squire and Winter (1951). A similar approach could be used to perform sensitivity assessments in the preliminary stage of design, and could be readily extended to engine-realistic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary velocities associated with the predicted vorticity field of the Marsh model are calculated via a streamfunction ψ (Squire and Winter, 1951), such that:…”
Section: Secondary Flow Velocities and Skementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary flow in a blade row can be defined as any flow, which is not in the direction of the primary or streamwise flow. The classical theories of secondary flow, as developed by Squire & Winter (1951), Hawthorne (1955) and Smith (1955) described the mechanism of the streamwise vorticity formation at blade row exit. Until now, several physical models have been developed to describe the secondary flow vortices in turbine cascade (e.g.…”
Section: Secondary Flow Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, s-nce the particulate trajectories depend on the motion of fluid surrounding them, it is impossible to predict the particulate trajectories without first understanding the three-dimensional nature of the secondary flows in the blade passages and the wake. Although many analyses have been performed in efforts to understand the behaviro of particulate-free secondary flow [3,5,5,6,7], a precise mathematical description of the fluid motion still remains elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical studies of secondary flows in References [4,5,6,12,13] have been confined to situations where incompressible fluid is deflected through a bend of constant curvature (i.e., an arc of circle) and constant cross section. While these theoretical investigations have considered both stationary and rotnting passages, many are still, limited by simplifying assumptions, not only with respect to the behavior of tIe fluid flow, but also to the geometry of the cascade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%