2019
DOI: 10.1177/1748895819839734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The security field: Forming and expanding a Bourdieusian criminology

Abstract: Recent scholarly contributions have sought to integrate Bourdieusian sociology with criminology, centring for example, on the 'street' field as a symbolic and narrative space occupied by players within criminal justice. This article complements this broad objective by focusing on the changes in contemporary police and security governance that are pointing towards an emerging security field. Such a change can be read from the literature on plural policing and crime control, and involves the morphology of polici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of rural crime in Ireland which we have shown, this process was driven by political and media definitions of the situation: moreover, senior police officers and their representative organizations took positions as an attempt at legitimate naming (Loader & Mulcahy, 2001). Similarly, Bowden (2019) has shown how such position taking is a critical process in what he has defined as the security field, the space which opened up by the pluralization of policing typical of the late modern, neo-liberal policy landscape on crime control. Hence an interesting development of the crime-talk approach might be to delve into discourses and local nodal forms of security Dupont (2004) based upon security talk and security action.…”
Section: Doing Crime-talk Researchmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the case of rural crime in Ireland which we have shown, this process was driven by political and media definitions of the situation: moreover, senior police officers and their representative organizations took positions as an attempt at legitimate naming (Loader & Mulcahy, 2001). Similarly, Bowden (2019) has shown how such position taking is a critical process in what he has defined as the security field, the space which opened up by the pluralization of policing typical of the late modern, neo-liberal policy landscape on crime control. Hence an interesting development of the crime-talk approach might be to delve into discourses and local nodal forms of security Dupont (2004) based upon security talk and security action.…”
Section: Doing Crime-talk Researchmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…security). M. Bowdenas šiems pokyčiams analizuoti pasitelkia P. Bourdieu sociologiją, todėl analizuoja saugumo arba apsaugos lauką (Bowden 2021). Beje, M. Bowdenas savo straipsnį traktuoja kaip besiplečiančios P. Bourdieu įtakos kriminologijai faktą (Bowden 2021, p. 170-174).…”
Section: Policijos Elgsenos Pokyčių Tyrinėjimaiunclassified
“…The field becomes a place of struggle to maintain and fight for position, power, and legitimacy, ultimately changing the structure of domination. Here, the actors fight with all the resources (capital) and strategies they have, in defending and claiming their position in the hierarchy (Bowden, 2021). This battle also seeks to compete for influence and defend resources.…”
Section: Crime Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%