The Security–Reliability Tradeoff of Multiuser Scheduling-Aided Energy Harvesting Cognitive Radio Networks

Abstract

We study the physical-layer security of a cognitive radio system in the face of multiple eavesdroppers (EDs), which is composed of a secondary base station (SBS), multiple secondary users (SUs) as well as a pair of primary transmitter (PT) and primary receiver (PR), where the SUs first harvest energy from their received radio frequency signals transmitted by the PT and then communicate with the SBS relying on opportunistic scheduling. We consider two specific user scheduling schemes, namely the channel-aware user scheduling (CaUS) and energyaware user scheduling (EaUS). In the CaUS scheme, an SU having the best instantaneous SU-SBS link (spanning from SUs to SBS) will be activated to communicate with the SBS. By contrast, the EHbUS scheme takes into account both the amount of energy harvested from the PT and the instantaneous quality of the SU-SBS link. We analyze the security-reliability tradeoff (SRT) of both the CaUS and of the EaUS schemes in terms of their intercept vs outage probability. We also provide the SRT analysis of traditional round-robin user scheduling (RrUS) used as a benchmarker of the CaUS and EaUS schemes. We demonstrate that the EaUS scheme achieves the best outage and secrecy performance in the high main-to-eavesdropper ratio (MER) region, but a worse secrecy performance than the CaUS method in the low-MER region. Moreover, from a security vs reliability perspective, the CaUS outperforms both the EaUS and the RrUS in the low-MER region. Surprisingly, this also implies that although the user scheduling criterion of EaUS exploits the knowledge of both the amount of harvested power and instantaneous channel state information (CSI), it exhibits a degraded physical-layer security in the low-MER region, due to the increased harvested energy is beneficial not only for the legitimate SBS receiver, but also for the EDs.Index Terms-Cognitive radio networks, energy harvesting, X. Ding * is with the Jiangsu

Security Analysis for Underlay Cognitive Network with Energy-Scavenging Capable Relay over Nakagami-m Fading Channels

“…Although various works analyzed the security performance of the direct message transmission (i.e., no relay) in underlay cognitive networks with energy scavenging (e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and references therein), few publications [15][16][17][18][19][20] have paid attention to security evaluation for the underlay cognitive network with the energy-scavenging capable relay (UCNwEScR). To be more specific, the authors in [15] investigated the UCNwEScR in which the decode-and-forward unlicensed relay consumes its energy scavenged from the RF signals of the unlicensed sender and the licensed transmitter to forward the unlicensed sender's message to the unlicensed recipient as the direct message transmission is unreliable.…”

A Survey of Energy and Spectrum Harvesting Technologies and Protocols for Next Generation Wireless Networks

“…In [164], physical-layer security for EH-aided CR is proposed. Two scheduling algorithms that are advantageous for the users are described as channel-aware user scheduling (CaUS) and energy-aware user scheduling (EaUS).…”

“…In [161]- [163], scheduling for EH and spectrum sensing based heterogeneous CR sensor networks is discussed in the context of green communications. Physical layer security is also a primary concern in EH based CR, which is studied in [164]. Time scheduling for backscatteraided RF powered CR networks is discussed in [165].…”

Towards Securing Routing Based on Nodes Behavior During Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks

“…Many cryptographic security frameworks for data mobility or nodes transmission have been proposed in several environments such as MANETs, VANETs, UAVs, WMNs, and WSNs [32][33][34][35]. Such frameworks cannot be directly applied in CRNs because of their unique individuality.…”